English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-09 16:35:53 · 22 answers · asked by living9times 1 in Science & Mathematics Astronomy & Space

22 answers

Yes, but that doesn't mean that all Apollo missions really go to the Moon. 14, 15, 16, and 17 are suspicious, or at least the videos on them.

But it doesn't matter on whether or not the United States of America go to the Moon, what is more curious is... why the Soviet Union didn't go to the Moon?

I don't buy into the conspiracy theories that said the Soviet Union didn't go to the Moon due 'technical difficulties', 'internal conflicts', and so on. The Soviet Union if it really was in a cold war, it wouldn't stop until it put more cosmonauts than astronauts on the Moon.

Soviet Union's decision to stop their Moon program surely make the cold war look like a hoax.

2007-03-09 21:02:44 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Yes of course we sent people to the moon!!! Are you really that stupid? But some people don't know this. Neil Armstrong wasn't the first on the moon. The first person on the moon (don't know the name) happened about 5 to 10 years earlier. They kept it a secret so the can create buildings on the moon without anyone knowing but some do know. It was on a few radio shows and many sites on the internet. And now they are saying that there are buildings that NASA or any other space program didn't make. No one knows how they got there but I think they made them and are trying to make the world frantic about aliens invading. You can NEVER trust the facts no matter how old you are when you hear them. So to sum my answer up, Yes, people were sent to the moon, just not when you thought they were or why. E-mail me for pic of an actual crane and buildings on the moon!

2007-03-09 18:41:21 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

That would have been a hell of an undertaking… sending the entire United States to the moon. Think of the vast amounts of fuel needed to perform that feat!

2007-03-09 17:54:12 · answer #3 · answered by slovakmath 3 · 1 0

It's too bad that people jump to conclusions without giving ideas much thought or research. I spent a little time examining several important historic events and much to my surprise, just about every time, I discovered many inaccuracies and omissions in the officially sanctioned story. Unfortunately, we cannot count on media to report the facts. (However FOX did do a good report on the moon landing hoax.)

There are many issues associated with the trip to the moon:

- There were no pictures of stars from the moon although without an atmosphere, we should have seen unbelievably detailed photos of the stars directly above the astronauts. No one thought to do it? Huh?)

- There was no dust blown away at the base of the lander and foot prints everywhere near where the dust would have blown away. Also, why was there no dust on the lander itself?

- How could astronauts have survived the Van Allen belt? The capsule and suit provide minimal protection against radiation. Ask any unbiased astrophysicist how fried you would be. (NASA has a vested interest.)

- Why was the background in many images on the moon's surface repeated in photos taken at supposedly different locations?

- Why were shadows pointing in different directions? There was only one light source on the moon.

- Why were the astronauts and other objects illuminated when they went into shadows? (multiple light sources?)

To me the simplest explanation for all of these things is the fact that we did not land on the moon in 1969. It was and it still is technologically impossible to fly astronauts beyond the lower limits of the Van Allen belt.

2007-03-09 17:16:36 · answer #4 · answered by Skeptic 7 · 1 4

Of course not. Do you know how hard it would be to get the entire country to the moon? And what would have kept Canada and Mexico apart if the US had gone?

2007-03-09 17:07:57 · answer #5 · answered by Captain Hammer 6 · 1 0

Unfortunately,our friends went "to the moon",at least until Novemer 2008.

2007-03-09 16:44:52 · answer #6 · answered by craig 2 · 0 0

yep - I don't think it was such a big technical thing to overcome. Now if you could make the moon into cheese - now you are talking. Being impress with something you can't do, just shows us what we have yet to learn as individuals.

2007-03-09 17:07:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I have not been on YA very long, but this question sure gets asked alot. The answer is the mirror. Do some looking on previous questions. I have seen many people give excellent answers about the mirror.

2007-03-09 16:42:58 · answer #8 · answered by Roy E 4 · 1 0

Everybody knows that the moon itself is just a big NASA hoax, the Earth is flat, and Elvis is alive and working in a donut shop in Cleveland.

2007-03-09 16:41:47 · answer #9 · answered by Chug-a-Lug 7 · 0 1

Why do people think that our government could keep that kind of secret for this long with the number of people that would have had to be involved? It would be next to impossible to stage that large of a hoax and keep the secret.

2007-03-09 16:45:29 · answer #10 · answered by tipp10 4 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers