Alright, so I have discovered this so-called "Top Contributor" tag that so many people appear to have. It is described as someone who is "particularly knowledgable" in a certain category. Don't you love how people can always fake their way into things like this, and it's always the people who are really good at things that spend life in a miserable unacknowledged existence? Not to offend you Top Contributors (I am sure a good deal of you know what you are talking about and have earned that rank with hours of hard work, but others have just earned it for nothing.), but in general, the people who earn credit are usually the ones who pretend to know how to do things, not the ones who put the best effort and most logical proof into things. What are your opinions? Agree or disagree, and why?
2007-03-09
14:57:05
·
5 answers
·
asked by
whatifgecko
3
in
Society & Culture
➔ Other - Society & Culture
Well, seeing as a few people don't understand what constitutes an answer here, I thought I might point out that "Bitter...party of 1." is not an answer, so if any more of you brilliant answerers would like to submit similar garbage, please refrain. Also, Stefan, I understand that this is a democracy, but what does that have to do with the question? I asked why you think they get more credit, not whether or not they are entitled to answer questions. I am not trying to "hate on people" here, I am trying to strike up a friendly question on worldly matters not necessarily pertaining to Yahoo! Answers. Ever heard of an analogy? And I'm not quite sure what "sensorship" is, but I am certainly not trying to blot out anybody's views. And finally, I do not understand what you are trying to prove by calling me a sheep, but then again, there are some people who think that petty insult will get them somewhere in life.
2007-03-10
01:12:26 ·
update #1