I have never seen them cover a story so much like this one... do they have some vested interest in this coverage... I am sick to death of this and wish they would get the hint and move on to other celebrities... I swear this Mark Steines is one of the possible contenders for daddy of Dannielynn... Please enough!
2007-03-09 14:21:53 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
I totally agree! Anna Nicole was just a joke for most of us...she wasn't special at all...She just happened to have big boobs... She never did anything worhtwhile... I'd rather hear about real celebrities who do something charitable. I would much rather hear about someone like Morgan Freeman who is voicing his opinion on rasicm, trying to make the world a better place.
2007-03-09 14:30:23 · answer #1 · answered by Steelersfan 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Entertainment Tonight has exclusive rights (some kind of contract with Howard and Anna) to tell their story. All the other tabloid TV shows are getting their stories second- and third-hand, but ET's got the only pipeline from the source. That's why they're slanting their coverage in favor of Howard being Dannielynn's father and, oh, how he loves her and, oh, how he loves and misses Anna Nicole. And, by golly, Larry Birkhead isn't too bad of a guy, but it's "HOWARD, HOWARD, HOWARD". See if you don't pick up on this! BTW, Mark Steines is a big suckup.
2007-03-09 16:41:39 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They probably do not have enything else interesting to talk about and think that everybody wants to know about celebrities, I hope this is not the case, but appearently everybody keeps watching.
2007-03-09 14:25:08 · answer #3 · answered by Julia E 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am really sick of it and so are the other people I have talked to. What in the world has she ever done? Get over it!
2007-03-09 14:30:25 · answer #4 · answered by kattsmeow 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree but I heard that Howard & ET have some kind of deal
2007-03-09 14:25:51 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
They mistakenly think we still care. It's kinda morbid to me. The poor woman has been dead almost a month. They need to let her rest in peace.
2007-03-09 14:38:55 · answer #6 · answered by robee 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it's the easiest to cover right now, and maybe the producers of ET had a crush on her
2007-03-09 14:25:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
that's tabloid journalism at it's finest! she gave'em a few interviews and now they're capitalizing on her death like they were the only show she trusted.sickening! all about ratings!
2007-03-09 14:29:03 · answer #8 · answered by G=ME 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I Guss what ever takes money.That's all they care about.
2007-03-09 14:29:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
because she was a playboy playmate and theres lots of drama in her life
2007-03-09 14:30:28 · answer #10 · answered by d_geneva 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋