What was the distance between neighbouring galaxies at Big Bang?

Question

What was the distance between neighbouring galaxies at Big Bang?

Answer 1

According to Friedmann's model,it was Zero.

Answer 2

They hope to learn more about the nature of the universe to within a trillionth of a second after the Big Bang when they get the large hadron super collider completed at the end of the year. But they do know the universe didn't cool down enough to start forming galaxies for at least several hundred thousand years after the Big Bang.

Answer 3

There were no galaxies in the big bang. The big bang was an expansion of the elementary building blocks of matter - not galaxies or stars or planets. As the matter expanded, it condensed into protons, electrons, neutrons, and then atoms, and then the atoms condensed into clouds forming the first stars, the large assosiations of which were galaxies. This took billions of years.

Answer 4

I answer from the platform that the huge bang is authentic. i don't be attentive to what's complicated to comprehend approximately black holes. they have been laboratory simulated by skill of coiled twine which could seize the great spectrum and comprise it without destroying it. style of like a sponge that soaks up water. the growth you talk of, is being prov en right this moment, that each and all the situation interior the universe is moving a similar course, as though being attracted to the preliminary element of the "massive bang". particular, it may enhance and nonetheless pass in a commiserate way a similar distance. area isn't something extra effective than a displacement, that has no longer been yet measured. because of the fact area gives you no resistance, any merchandise of mass will shuttle at a persevering with velocity and heading till rigidity is exerted on it. Scientists have pr oven that there is a persevering with rigidity drawing ALL regular remember a similar course, and to me this could point out that in the time of spite of everyday growth, in some unspecified time interior the destiny this could stop and destiny growth would be linear in basic terms in direction of the commencing element. for the cratered injury seen on maximum planets and moons, our action picture star has no longer continuously been. whilst it shaped, there replaced right into a extensive disc of galactic airborne dirt and dirt and fabric some displaced and a few spinning. photograph voltaic winds displaced this remember to the place it particularly is going to certainly amassed. to no longer point out occasional chunks of rock that have been alien to our photograph voltaic-equipment. so which you're asking particularly approximately unknowns, and whats going to take place whilst an unknown situation meets an unknown. If the universe holds authentic to what we journey in our very own international, we (the great universe) would be drawn lower back into the commencing element and if there is inadequate potential to blow up lower back, we are able to be scattered by skill of the unique displacement, yet this won't take place in area, authentic? Or is it available we've been ejected added than effect. because of the fact the great universe is drawn a similar course, it may be theoretically sound to return to a determination that we've been projected with the aid of displacement and are being pulled lower back by skill of vacumn or or we are as a universe orbiting something or caught in a magnetic pull.

Answer 5

There were no galaxies at the Big Bang.

Answer 6

According to Friedmans model, it was zero. But at the instant of the 'Big Bang' there was no mass. Only energy. In fact, there was no light because photons had not yet formed (nor any of the other elementary particles).

It's actually a kind of a 'non-question'.

HTH ☺

Doug

Answer 7

i should thinjk that at that precise moment there was no distance because everything is expanding from a central point so they must have all been in that central point.

ps. that must have been some damn heavy matter i'd love to get my hands on some and play pranks on people who like marbles. but since the big bang is over i guess i'll have to resort back to neutron star or the matter in a black hole.

Answer 8

Hi. Zero. The origin resulted in 'quark soup' which did not contain any other particles until the soup condensed into matter. It was not until the matter condensed that light could pass through this soup. Electron and protons (and probably positrons and anti-protons) then formed and it was this gas that formed the original galaxies (after forming lots of black holes, in my opinion).

Answer 9

There were no galaxies because all this stuff hadn't formed the particles of matter that make up atoms, molecules, and everything else.

Answer 10

None. That garbage of a theory never happened.

Well it didn't. This whole beautiful planet formed with perfect life with a stupid "Big Bang"? Tell me, where did the molecules or whatever stuff it was, come from to cause the Big Bang? Explain that one.