Before the hunting of the 1800's depleted the American bison so badly, they were the most numerous single species of large wild mammal on Earth (estimated at 30 million in 1800). That doesn't even include the domesticated and other wild cattle herds, or the huge bison herds on other continents.
The USA currently only has an approx. pop. of 45 million domesticated cattle.
If "livestock are a major emitter of greenhouse gases that cause climate change" why didn't they see any sign of it in the 1800's?
Note: While I do believe in Global warming, I don't believe it's caused by anything on earth, I believe it's a solar caused phenomenon.
Sources:
http://www.csmonitor.com/2007/0220/p03s01-ussc.html
http://www.aphis.usda.gov/lpa/issues/bse/bse-surveillance.html
http://www.zabada.com/zabada/deals/The-Destruction-of-the-Bison-An-enviromental-History-1750-1920-Studies-in-enviroment-and-History-/0521003482/item
http://www.russiablog.org/2007/03/russian_astronomer_points_to_g.php
2007-03-09
12:37:45
·
3 answers
·
asked by
Raising6Ducklings!
6
in
Science & Mathematics
➔ Weather
Monarene:
They don't produce methane, huh? The UN just had a studied that listed them as the main methance producer in the world. You should check the facts of the people you're supporting. The UN study is one of my sources listed above.
2007-03-09
14:45:44 ·
update #1