What right has a Maltese citizen tony galea have to endanger his country by testifying against a terrorist?

Question

I think the media plays a part in terrorism in the world today by viewing terror . The lockerbie bombing happened in 1988 pan am flight 103 but the actions of a Maltese citizen Tony Galea endangered the lives of people in Malta and around the world as media was invovled playing a large part that a small country should have not been part of as malta is a place for familys not people who endanger the lives of the innocent.Its better to some times say nothing than endanger as media cause more damage as media can be classified as a world terrorist tool for both sides.To be quite is better.I dont support people who commit crimes of the heart of terrorism but dont dont support people who endanger live through the courts and media.

I would like to see media jailed for endangering countrys and people or fined more than they have to spend .

All i'm saying is that the old ways are better as in the 50's they knew how to keep there mouth shut and conduct business and do the job needed to keep people safe .As now its big noting to get to stardom .

Answer 1

Yes, it would be good to be silent. Considering I've read your other posts and it is clear that you either are Islamic or support Islam, it seems good that others would stay silent about terrorism.

However, not to me.
We see what Islamic dictators have in mind for the rest of the world, and we HAVE spoken up, and will continue to do so.

Will they react and try to hurt us more? Yes.

And when Islam finishes her revolution, and Islam is no more in its present form, but flowers as a 21st century religion that TREASURES freedom, free speech, religious freedom for all religions, then you will see what freedom is all about.

You can't win this one. You can't hide from communications that are improving more every day. You can't keep people ignorant forever.

Actually, you can't even keep them ignorant past this decade.

It's too late.

Answer 2

So, you think he should not have testified in court, just because the criminals might harm others......

By that logic, no criminals would ever get convicted.