2007-03-09 10:27:38 · 12 answers · asked by achronicfan 3 in Travel ➔ Europe (Continental) ➔ Netherlands
I dont even know why you are asking this question???
Amsterdam.... all the way!!!
Unless you have a heavy gambling problem, but there are tons of "slots" in Amsterdam, too!
Amsterdam has it all, history, sex, drugs, and alcohol!
Seeing Van Gogh on pot, much cooler than when sober, lol!
2007-03-09 11:33:59 · answer #1 · answered by Mac 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Amsterdam
2007-03-09 12:42:56 · answer #2 · answered by miraflores 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Although I have never been to Amsterdam I would suggest you go there. My mother is born and the Netherlands and I have heard much about it. I was in Las Vegas in February and unless you are a gambler and want to lose money there is not much else besides lots of walking and expensive shopping. The casinos are nice on the outside but if you lose lots in the casinos they are not really worth it. Driving I dont recommend in vegas. You can get a 24hrs bus pass cheap and get on and off as much as you want. It goes right down the strip
2007-03-09 10:38:53 · answer #3 · answered by itybittykitty 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you're a stoner, Amsterdam is paradise. Nothin like waking up in a hostel to someone passing you a phattie. If you're an all around partier/drinker, Vegas is the place to be. Though there are plenty of bars in Amsterdam, it's not as fun to drink there as it is in Vegas. $5 blackjack tables in Vegas will help satisfy the low gambling budget as well.
If you're going for sex, there's plenty to be had in both places. You're most likely to score a drunken hottie in Vegas (for free!) than you are in Amsterdam. If you don't mind paying for it, Amsterdam gives you the oppurtunity to bang a hot chick that normally would be out of your league. And the sex is guaranteed! =D
2007-03-10 11:57:21 · answer #4 · answered by Nutty Bunny 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Definitely Amsterdam, plenty of things to do and see. Unless you are an addicted player, I guess there is no reason to visit Las Vegas.
2007-03-10 03:44:13 · answer #5 · answered by yiotadelta 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
do you want to know wich is best to visit or wich we think was best if we visited both??? i live in holland and have ofcourse been to amsterdam, i have been to las vegas as well and it was cool, i guess it all depends on whatyou like and want out of the trip, i mean las vegas to me is more a night town, lots to do at night, boring and very ugly /dirty during the day. amsterdam has both, nightlife and during the day you have the boat rides on the canals, museums etc etc, so i guess you better off in amsterdam, more to do there,
goodluck and have fun if you plannin a trip, either place, don't spend too much money hahahahaha
2007-03-10 07:20:35 · answer #6 · answered by dutchcutie68 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
right this is the reality: you may visit Sunderland interior the north of england, a small city and prolly get greater STDs than in Vegas or Amsterdam. You ask why? straight forward, human beings in Vegas or Amsterdam are so switched on in terms of the sexual stuff and so used to it there is prolly greater secure practices than going to a small city in England or Europe or the U. S. and shagging there without secure practices. seize my waft? in any case, you stupid person (LMAO! dnt prefer to insult yet yeah) purely use secure practices and no STDs, gosh :P Rapture: You and ur Amsterdam fantasies :P lmao!
2016-10-17 23:56:21 · answer #7 · answered by fanelle 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Amsterdam
Las Vegas really isnt all that exciting
2007-03-09 10:35:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
For gambling . . . .Vegas
For seeing tulips in spring. . . .Amsterdam
For smoking pot, legally . . .Amsterdam
For stepping in dog-doo along the streets. . . Amsterdam
For driving around in your own car. . . .Vegas
Depending on what fun you are looking for, however, I would pick Vegas with a greater variety.
2007-03-09 10:38:54 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
amsterdam!!! more forms of smoking entertainment are legal
2007-03-09 10:35:51 · answer #10 · answered by debijean 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋