English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Google....Terror Attacks of 911....and look at all the choices there are to choose from.

2007-03-09 10:27:34 · 4 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Media & Journalism

4 answers

LITTLE BY LITTLE
Your question is a wake-up call.
Unfortunately, it may attract alot of abuse. Ignore them.
I first heard it on the Howard Stern radio show and the guy was actually serious. Thought it might be a bad Howard joke. Then reality dawned. It was surreal.
My gut feelings... How could this happen? Where the hell was NORAD?
Like Oswald being shot. (He WAS being guarded, wasn't he?) Totally Weird.
By the time the second plane hit, many people were armed with camcorders. Great to catch lies with. "In Plane Site" resounds in Truth. "The Great Conspiracy - the 911 News Special You Never Saw" is fine too.
"Loose Change" really brought NORAD to question. Global Guardian, Vigilant Guardian, Vigilant Warrior, Amalgam Warrior, Crown Vigilance, Apollo Guardian all became part of my vocabulary.
Remember 9/10??? Rumsfeld admitted to losing 2.3 TRILLION Defence Department dollars. The next day all that evaporates. Now we know where the money went.
NORAD blamed the FAA. Leaving the entire eastern seaboard open to "attack" by commercial airliners for more than an hour is preposterous and only a child could accept that!
Enter Bush.
Once he opened his mouth, that clinched it.
9/11 is a "false flag" event(s), a "military-op" (CIA lingo) and a pretext for war. WMD's were a pretext to go into Iraq. (A LIE)
The rest is academic because Science does not lie.
For TRUTH, check out Professor Emeritus Jim Fetzer or the recent discovery of fermite/fermate (demolition residue) in WTC steel samples by Professor Steven Jones (BYU) which explains how these buildings collapsed at (nearly) free fall speed.
Also, jet fuel cannot melt steel - that's Engineering 101.
The smoking guns are everywhere.

2007-03-10 02:49:27 · answer #1 · answered by JJ 2 · 1 0

To whom am I speaking? Lisa,Katrina,Ginger,Lory,Susan... Brenda, Bob, Nancy, Curly, Moe or Shep. I clicked on one of your questions that said "Asker Lisa" and the question came up with Brenda's tag. Can't keep all your accounts straight can you. Doesn't do much for your creditability. Is it not also corrupt to have many accounts or avatars, to ask questions then answer them yourself and give yourself "Best Answer". Huh. isn't it? Many on this site as, you know have said the same. Below is one such answer about you.
thenextjfk - No, the funniest one is when I asked if Nancy and Crypto Jew Girl (2 separate accounts!) were the same person, and BRENDA answered "no we are not"
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index

2007-03-09 20:42:50 · answer #2 · answered by ohbrother 7 · 1 1

You are the liar. If you impeach bush now you waste millions of taxpayer dollars.
Why are you so afraid bush will win in Iraq any way??

2007-03-09 13:04:15 · answer #3 · answered by mark k 3 · 2 3

Never because there were no lies..............Nancy aka the spammer

2007-03-09 10:37:35 · answer #4 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers