(Using their bats to whack each other over the head, of course)
2007-03-09 10:11:09 · 8 answers · asked by Alyosha 4 in Sports ➔ Other - Sports
A baseball bat would snap [in half] easily, but the structure of a cricket bat would produce a nice sound, and the bat would stay intact!!!!
aaah... the comforting sound of skin on willow lol...
Cricketers also have to be super fit- for activities like running between wickets, fielding, bowling, running around ALL DAY etc.
2007-03-09 10:18:00 · answer #1 · answered by Ravi A 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Gotta be the baseball guy for me,but depends on the size of the player,also baseball bats break easier than a cricket bat.
2007-03-09 18:36:31 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
however much i would like to say cricket, i think baseball, as the bat has more wood at one end, and would cause more damage instead of being flat and even like a cricket bat.
however, if a golfer was about to join the fight, goodbye cricketer and baseball player...
tiger woods is harder than he looks.
2007-03-09 18:19:42 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
It depends on who the bat wielders are. For example, an unarmed martial arts expert could easily defeat a person with a bat...unless the person with the bat is also a martial arts expert.
2007-03-09 19:58:44 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Cricketer definitely
2007-03-09 18:28:26 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
cricketer their bat covers a larger area would be fun to watch tho
2007-03-09 18:15:36 · answer #6 · answered by theoriginalbitch 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
cricketer every time (only because I'm British) LOL
2007-03-09 18:15:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
baseball, they use HGH
2007-03-09 18:15:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋