You're pretending it's okay that he hypocritically worked to impoach Clinton while having an affair, on the basis that he didn't lie about it under oath. Well, nobody asked him, did they?
And it gets worse. Remember, the wife he cheated on was the one he married after dumpting Wife #1. Here's the story on that:
He married his High School teacher soon after graduating. By the time he became a Big Shot, she was too old and frumpy for him, so he exchanged her for a newer model. He slapped divorce papers on her while she was in a hospital bed with cancer! And he was a Deadbeat Dad, refused to pay child support, which relegated them to begging from their local church (the origin of the Faith Based Initiative??)
Of course, none of this is remotely as bad as what Clinton did! You moralistic phonies!
2007-03-09
07:42:47
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Law & Ethics
"Excusing Bill"? Now that you mention it, he never should have been asked about his CONSENSUAL behavior in a civil suit over sexual harrassment. His questionable answer is not pertinent, so it is not perjury. If i, for example, was a witness testifying in a case, and they asked me my age, and I said, 157, that would be a lie. But it would not be perjury.
The case shouldn't have been brought until after the end of his term of office. They argued that it would tie up the Administration, and it did. It took our attention off the threat of terrorism. Republicans sure have their priorities straight. An Impeachment Crusade in search of an offense. They were out to impeadch him even BEFORE he met Monica!
2007-03-09
07:53:16 ·
update #1