I mean with an entire TV network and AM radio devoted exclusively to his spin (Fox News) and the others always treat him and his ideas far too nicely, he still can't manage an approval rating over 35%.
Not to take anything away from Buchannan or Andrew Johnson, but Mr. Bush is certainly in the running for the worst president ever (WPE, or the Weep).
I mean no president has acted with so much incompetence on every level. From heathcare, education, outsourcing, increasing poverty, and of course the worst foriegn policy disaster of all time his folly in Iraq.
I would like serious answers pro and con. A "but this president did this" doesn't cut it because Bush has ACTED much worse then any modern president had nightmares about.
Clinton was lampooned for monica, Ford for being clumsy (even though he wasn't) Nixon for a stupid break in. (ok I violated my own rule) But why shouldn't the press call Bush what he really is?
2007-03-09
06:03:01
·
4 answers
·
asked by
Jimbo
2
in
News & Events
➔ Media & Journalism
For the person who wants details on Bush's increase of poverty, just do a little bit of research, poverty has skyrocketed over the past few years.
You say a lot of nothing. This question is for people who are educated. I make no attempt to re-teach 7th grade lessons to you.
2007-03-09
08:50:16 ·
update #1