Choose the best answer that goes to this question
2007-03-09 05:44:56 · 24 answers · asked by Alex T 1 in Sports ➔ Football (American)
Of those choices, I'll take Vick without question. At least he can run.
2007-03-09 05:47:09 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Rex Grossman is the better football player but neither are that good. Grossman is young and a little indecisive (a little, ha!) but all Vick can do is run. It's impossible to build an offense around Vick.
2007-03-09 05:55:49 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rex Grossman is a young mediocre quarterback that will probably improve. Michael Vick is a very good running back that occasionally throws a good pass. So, Michael Vick is a better football player, but not to good at hiding drugs.
2007-03-09 05:49:40 · answer #3 · answered by Chuck Briggs 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Michael Vick. He can take over a game with all his skills. Let's put it this way. If Michael Vick had been in the Superbowl instead of Rex Grossman, the Bears would have won the Superbowl. Grossman is so hit or miss from game to game. Vick is someone you can build an offense around. Grossman is someone who needs the offense around him built to even be decent.
2007-03-09 05:50:19 · answer #4 · answered by binary sunset 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Mike Vick or Rex Grossman? Seriously they both suck! Mike Vick should be a damn runningback. Rex Grossman should just be a backup quarterback for a new quarterback that the Bears should get! The best quarterback in the league is; Payton Manning!
2007-03-09 07:08:55 · answer #5 · answered by Jimmy D 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmm Grossman guides his team to the SB in his third year, Vick guides his team to a good draft position in his 6/7 th year and got his coach fired. Grossman handles criticism with a modicum of poise, Vick gives nitwits the finger. Grossman will play ten plus years in the NFL, Vick is one career ending tackle away from being unemployed. It's a toss up...
2007-03-09 07:21:56 · answer #6 · answered by ralegas 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well i think Vick is better...right now though...you have to remember when Grossman is having a good game....which is sometimes...he doesn't do bad...for instance against the Saints....but they both aren't that good
2007-03-09 08:33:04 · answer #7 · answered by m_snyder13 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The BEST? Neither. Perhaps you mean BETTER. Grossman is the better QB though. Since they are both QBs I have to say Grossman is the better player.
2007-03-09 07:16:24 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would take Grossman because he would be fine if he could remain consistant. Vick needs alot more help becoming a good QB and his legs dont win games.
2007-03-09 06:01:51 · answer #9 · answered by MJMGrand 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Vick by far...at least vick can run a football and break records, grossman is just horrible he can't throw he can't run
2007-03-09 05:54:42 · answer #10 · answered by p-diddy 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Grossman sucks!
Vick has talent, but Grossman just sucks! He showed us that in the Superbowl.
They need to tell that guy...
"YOU ARE THE WEAKEST LINK! GOODBYE!"
2007-03-09 05:47:40 · answer #11 · answered by Ryan 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋