Procedure for IMPEACHMENT of 636 FORESWORN members?Congressperson?

Question

UPON OATH OF OFFICE, 100 Senators and 636 Representatives have foresworn obljgation of Article 1,section 8,clause 11,Powers not to be foisted off on EEO, FDIC,DEA,DOE,DOD, Cinc but Reserved to the Congress, in particular, Power to declare war in name off United States. to make rules concerning Guantanaml bay "detained Afghanistan Patriots" guilty of opposing Presidential campaign to invade,occupy, an vehemently overthrow Afgahangovernment and wreak havoc in the soverign state lf Afghanistan. previously invading and kidnapping Elected President of Haiti,sending trops withour t declstation of War upon Grenada. firing missiles upon soverign turf of Libya under Khadafi regime of soverign state of Libya with NO CONGRESSIONAL DECLARATION OF WAR with Libya preceding .USN ACT of Terror against Lib ya.
Name Procedure
Impeach each oathed congress- person in, the US Senate and House of Representatives for high crime: of OATH_BREAKING misdemeanor:: legislating tohe contrary of Const.?

Answer 1

First, Congress can delegate administrative authority to federal agencies. That's well settled law. As long as there is due process and judicial oversight, and as long as the federal agency is itself within the scope of federal authority, there's nothing wrong with delegation.

Second, Congress hasn't declared war regading Iraq or Afghanistan. They have issued an Authorization for the Use of Military Force pursuant to the War Powers Act of 1973.

Third, Congress is making rules regarding detainees in Gitmo. Yes, many of the rules are unconstitutional, but that's never been grounds for malfeasance claims before. They pass laws, the courts review them, Congress passes new laws, the cycle continues. That's they way it works.

As for the rest of the ramble, it's hard to tell what else you are claiming Congress did or did not do.

But to answer the question, members of Congress are not impeached. Individuals can be removed from office by a two-thirds vote of the members of the same chamber, but that doesn't work past 1/3 of the members.

The remedy you seek is called "elections". Remember that the entire House of Representatives is up for re-election every two years, along with 1/3 of the Senate.

Answer 2

Why no longer? you probably did it with bill Clinton in 'ninety 8--made up prices. only as i have been affirming... Hillary wins the '08 election, and the commercial equipment on the on the spot improves. A slender Democratic majority is re-elected. gas expenditures come down, human beings have funds of their wallet, and each little thing receives more suitable positive. The Republicans have no longer something yet "personality" to run on contained in the 2010 midterms, and individuals on the on the spot ignore about 3.00/gallon gas lower than Bush, they hearken to the Republican liars, and pick a Republican majority in November 2010... ...then Hillary is impeached contained in the spring of 2011. The Democrats must have impeached Bush even as that they had the threat, because the Republicans gained't anticipate a second time period to question a Clinton this time. they have realized their lesson.

Answer 3

wow I bet it took you all year to put that together. in the real world your argument holds no water. nice try. BTW was there a question in your rant?

Answer 4

That's the biggest bunch of hogwash I've ever read.

Answer 5

Hmmmm. No. I think not.