Into a nice little pile of dust?
Is there any logical people on this site today?
2007-03-09 04:46:48 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
That is a good question .Although I'm not an engineer .I know steel doesn't melt at 1200 degrees you can get almost half that temperature in your oven.I did think it was strange the way both towers dropped straight down ,as if a demolition company had done it .It would seem logical; that force from either direction would have caused a co lapse in a directional pattern .I hate to think our govt. could have had anything to do with it .Especially the way the president goes on about fighting terrorism .But I recently saw a web sight with a lot of information I wasn't aware of .The web sight is called (The power hour ) you can type it in yahoo search and find it .I recommend people go look at the information listed before you make up your mind .Just because we don't always like the truth doesn't change the fact that is the truth.
2007-03-09 05:16:40 · answer #1 · answered by dollars2burn4u 4 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Yes, the jet fuel was the main factor. Both jets were chosen because they were loaded with fuel for a long flight. The heat of the fuel melted the welds in the steel girders. The location of impact, in relation to the height of the towers were a factor also. (Osama Bin Laden has an enginerring degree and his family did major construction work in the Arabic Republics) So once the upper parts of the buildings collasped on the lowerfloors the weight created a "domino" effect collasping the Towers floor by floor down to the basement. The fuel also being liquid, it actually flooded down each floor. This was a diabolical plan that succeeded far beyond expectations.
2007-03-09 13:04:15 · answer #2 · answered by make room for daddy 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
A small fire did not caust WTC 7 to collapse.
Large multi-floor fires coupled with structural damage from large debris falling from the other collapsing buildings caused WTC 7 to collapse.
2007-03-09 12:53:45 · answer #3 · answered by dsl67 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why do you insist on asking this same question over and over...
it did not simply explode or collapse... you have a steel frame construction building... it was on fire.. and weakened by the collapse of TWO MASSIVE building practically falling down on top of it...
How strong do you think buildings are?
If you were not aware... Steel frame buildings are made up of vertical beams of steel, so basically you have a building made of metal poles standing upright... when the beams collapse you have a catastrophic collapse because the beams share the load... ever play with dominoes? they them up and push them over... that's what happens.
there was no free fall... do you even know what "free fall speed is?
watch the video carefully, you see the bottom collapse, then is starts to crumble in on its self... have you ever seen a burning building collapse? that's what they do, the weight from above pushed down, with the weakened super structure it falls in...
just because you change the question and the answer slightly you are still spamming, no matter what justification you give.
2007-03-09 13:39:08 · answer #4 · answered by Stone K 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Obviously you certainly are not a logical person. So you think it was just a small fire do you? Bldg 7 received quite a bit of damage from towers 1&2. This caused it. Do some homework. You are really making yourself look pathetic.
2007-03-09 12:54:02 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The rumor that it was a small fire is not rue, as soon on TV ther fires were huge and a huge multiple story skyscraper (one of the tallest) fell on top of and around it. Cummon now. Stop with this nonsense, it wasnt a controlled demolition, why do all that work when the larger building falling on it is enough?
2007-03-09 13:01:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Obviously not with questions like you are asking....1st..it was NOT a SMALL FIRE...IT BURNED FOR OVER 10 HOURS
2nd it was not a small pile of dust..it was a large pile of twisted metal and debris 3rd..WERE YOU THERE are you quoting 1st hand knowledge...NOPE you weren't...I WAS.
I spent 8 days digging body parts of friends and family out of the pile....you dishonor the memories of those innocents that died and the US with your false allegations...go back to uboob and if you bother to look close you can see how the videos were DOCTORED
2007-03-09 12:54:03 · answer #7 · answered by Real Estate Para Legal 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋
In the building itself was a small fire. Under the building was a large oil reserve storage tank on fire. That is what brought the building down.
There is enough REAL evidence that BUsh is a liar and failure so that there is no need to make up conspiracy theories
2007-03-09 12:51:55 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Are you making light of mass murder? What is funny about murder?
What kind of person are you? If you think pouring your venom out on Yahoo answers just gets a rise out of people, you are sadly incorrect.
You are a misanthorpe, if not a sociopath. Poor girl.
2007-03-09 12:59:29 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
It should be ...are there, not, is there, and, um, did you not see the film of the crashes like most people alive and around the world. Looked like a big fire to me.
2007-03-09 12:51:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋