Actually as a woman I agree with you. There are a few now and then who can do it. Margret Thatcher was awesome and I almost think Condi Rice could do it. But generally no. No offense to them, it's just the way it is.
2007-03-09 04:41:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Mercadies2000 7
·
0⤊
4⤋
There have been several countries that have had successful woman leaders. Briton's Margaret Thatcher is on that comes to mind right off the bat.
Some people shine under pressure. Besides, I don't think anyone, even a woman, could do worse than King George.
2007-03-09 04:46:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by rlkeebler 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes, women are "fit" to be president.
But you very plainly aren't, "man" or not. You're crazy if you think women are "mentally weaker." (I suppose this is why more women graduate from both high school and college than men.)
Britain and Germany and India and many other countries have already _had_ woman presidents, you goon. Get out of here.
2007-03-09 04:43:30
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
Why do people wake up one morning and say "gee I know whats wrong WE NEED A FEMALE PRESIDENT" I dont care who you are if you can run the country you get elected. I would abhor Hillary clinton in the white house. But it has nothing to do with her being a woman. There are just better women out there.
2007-03-09 04:51:49
·
answer #4
·
answered by Devdude 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't know what planet you're living on, or how much interaction you've had with women in the corporate world, but I'll tell you this: your supposition is dead wrong.
Weaker mentally? Are you kidding me? I work with women who make Arnold Schwarzenegger look like Pee Wee Herman.
And if you want to talk about saying one thing now and changing it in an hour, let me summarize it with one word: Bush.
2007-03-09 04:47:00
·
answer #5
·
answered by Hemingway 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
And someone like say, George Bush is mentally together? Or maybe Dick Cheney? Hillary Clinton has many problems, however mental weakness would not remotely be one of them. You are just a narrow minded chauvinist. probably with foreign roots and ideals to boot. That's what we REALLY need for president. A foreign chauvinist who is mentally strong, thank you. Then we can be like every other middle eastern and third world country.
2007-03-09 04:39:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by Stevie 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Yeah, OK, is that why boys are in such danger in schools? Because women are weaker mentally? LMFAO, nice try. And if you think for one minute that women don't already run the oval office, let's just say you have never been with a woman. lol
2007-03-09 04:51:10
·
answer #7
·
answered by hichefheidi 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
That's a pretty sexist comment. Last time I checked men can be just as moody. We had the same problem with Clinton - said one thing & did another. It should not matter what sex or race a candidate is - the only thing that matters is if they are qualified.
2007-03-09 04:40:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
0⤋
statistically speaking women have higher intelligence than most men, under pressure they are more calm as opposed to men, as for the moody, have you not heard of male PMS?
The number of bipolar men outweigh the number of women, thats the biggest cause of mood swings.
Also, a female has more of a protective instinct than a man does. If someone attacks her family (ie..country) they are more willing to retaliate to a vicious extent.
Learn your history regarding female leaders. We are second only to evil dictators, only our reign are more indicative of preventive measures as opposed to domination, which is typically a male rulers trait.
2007-03-09 12:35:45
·
answer #9
·
answered by Chrissy 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Actually, women often excel in the areas of education that are most important to being a world leader, like speech, history, political science.
And we already have a President who says one thing now and something else later.
Remember the wiretaps that were absolutely essential tools in the war against terrorism?
He just said not long ago that they're not really that important, so he isn't doing them any more.
Want more examples?
2007-03-09 04:38:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by Bush Invented the Google 6
·
7⤊
1⤋
Women have always been more capable than men, but to admit that offends the male ego.
Does your question concern a woman, or Hilary? Hilary is an evil, self-serving so-and-so. That's why she ignored the Monica thing. She is with Bill because it is profitable! The dollar is the thing. Hilary has NO CONCERN for the US- only for Hilary's money.
2007-03-09 04:45:47
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋