Rewind to 9-11, what difference would there be?

Question

What -"if"- in your own point of view, would be different if the administration followed the U.N. and "not" invaded Iraq?

Answer 1

No national debt.

3000 American troops not dead

20000 American troops not wounded

National Guard at home protecting Americans.

Iraqis walking the the streets of Baghdad in safety

Answer 2

What does 911 have to do with Iraq. We would have worked to expose the UN, Russia, and France even more to show that the only reason they were against any action was because Saddam was lining their pockets. 911 took us into Afghanistan, brought us the Dept. of Homeland Security, more security in our nation, made having a passport necessary at the Canadian and Mexican borders. But Iraq was going to happen whether we had a 911 or not. Even Clinton wanted to go into Iraq, but he had no credibility or backing.

Answer 3

back interior the 1950's - 1960's we would have sent some people out, with suitcases of money, and mentioned GET HIM. No questions could be asked approximately how. Israel did this after the Arabs attacked the Israel team on the Olympics in Munich, Germany. Took them quite a few years - yet they tracked all of them down and killed them. And while the Shah of Iran replaced into compelled in another country - the 1st time this exceeded off - a CIA guy went in with a suitcase, and paid the Clerics to evangelise to the individuals asserting they ought to help the Shah coming back. The Shah got here back and the greater advantageous Cleric (who have been given the main money) met him on the airport. The Cleric replaced into later kicked in another country by ability of the Shah. yet years later, the Cleric Komani (spelling ?) compelled the Shah out and got here back from France to rule the rustic. the fee of having the Shah back in ability - something like $50,000. the difficulty with 9/11 - the planes flying into the homes replaced right into a public fact - for each individual to work out. Bush ought to no longer deliver out hit adult adult males - that would not be something that must be seen. the yank people wished something they could see as a reaction - the only available answer - deliver OUT THE TROOPS. mind-blowing people make undesirable Presidents. throughout the time of WWII, the British had cracked the German codes. The British knew that Germany replaced into going to bomb a British city - yet while they warned the voters to get out of city - the Germans could be attentive to that the British had cracked the code. So Churchill ordered that no warning could get carry of. there's a properly-enjoyed image of Churchill going to the city after the bombing and watching the destruction and loss of life. What replaced into the righty determination - sacrific some thousand civilians or save secret techniques that should shorten the conflict and save much greater lives? no longer an complication-free determination to make or to stay with.

Answer 4

Dude, rewind and look at the facts. The UN took is loving sweet time but they agreed on the attack. If they hadn't taken so long Saddam's WMDs would have been found a lot faster and more of them.

You have a lop sided skewed view of what really happened.

Answer 5

The UN is completely worthless, so Saddam would still gassing his own, shooting at our no-fly patrols, would probably be 4 years closer to having a nuke, would still be paying bounty for suicide bombers, would still be bilking millions from the Annan family oil company, and would probably have financed several terrorist strikes against America just because he hates Bush just like the libs.

Answer 6

9-11 and Iraq have nothing to do with each other. We went to war with Afghanistan after 9-11.

Answer 7

A continuous repeat of 9/11. Our economy would be a mess; people would be terrified to fly anywhere. Americans would be living in constant fear of more attacks.

Answer 8

Saddam would be murdering his people rather than outside forces (e.g. Iran, Syria, etc.).

UN Oil-for-Food people would still be getting richer.

The chemical/biological weapons effort within IRAQ would still be progressing.

Answer 9

Osama would be DEAD
Al Qeada wouldn't have grow to this size
3000+ soldiers would NOT BE DEAD
100,000 + Iraqi civilians would NOT BE DEAD

George W Bush wouldn't go down in history as the liar that led his country into a war using known false evidence

Answer 10

then Al Qaeda would still be running in Afghanistan, Bush's approval rating would not be his shoe size, and no, there would not be terrorist attacks every day. In fact, there probably would be none