THIS IS THE MEANING ONCE AGAIN ON BIBLICAL ADULTERY:
The Meaning I reasearched states this commandment means:
No adultery
"Against [a man] having union with his mother." (
"Against [a man] having union with his sister."
"Against [a man] having union with the wife of his father." "Against [a man] having union with another man's wife." "Against [a man] copulating with a beast.""Against a woman copulating with a beast." "Against [a man] lying carnally with a male."
"Against [a man] lying carnally with his father."
"Against [a man] lying carnally with his father's brother."
"Against engaging in erotic conduct that may lead to a prohibited union. [That is, petting by persons whose marriage would be illicit.
The Bible Speaks agaisnt all these types of relationships, so if one is good why not all?
Who's the judge here?
Do you think now Homosexuals will have to fight the battle of 2 consenting related adults who want to be able to marry also?
2007-03-09 04:20:38 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
You have no idea what you are talking about. You are getting a commentary on one verse of scripture from one individual and not looking at the context, and the original Hebrew Text. Also, incest causes mental and sometimes physical disabilities. So have sex with your whole family and produce some really screwed up kids. Compare Apples to Apples not banging your Dad to Two dudes barebacking!
2007-03-09 09:09:39 · answer #1 · answered by studentofword84 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
What we are saying is that just because you interpret the bible to mean something is wrong doesn't make it wrong. And that religious arguments are not an acceptable basis for law-making. Separation of church and state.
When you want to make something illegal you have to prove that in the real world it is harmful. Not just say 'oh it's in the bible so noone should be allowed to do it'.
Something like having sex with children is pretty obviously harmful to the children. It can be proved without religious arguments that it hurts the the kids pychologically if they are raped so it's fine to make that illegal. Something like homosexuality between two consenting adults can't be proven as harmful so it can't be made illegal.
2007-03-09 12:33:09 · answer #2 · answered by helehelo 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
ROFLMAO!!
The secular laws are only concerned with persons related by blood closely enough to cause birth defects, nothing more.
I could frankly care less what your Bible has to say on the subject, it's "laws" and your "interpretation" of those laws have NO LEGAL STANDING and are completely irrelevant to all who do not believe or interpret the Bible as you do.
From your ranting, apparently you feel that YOU are the judge(something I believe you are warned not to do in your Bible) as well as standing their in self-righteous anger slinging stones toward what you perceive as "sins" committed by others(which you were ALSO told not to do by no less than your Christ himself).
No, Homosexuals are not obligated in any way to support incest. You really should have your medication checked.
2007-03-09 12:33:41 · answer #3 · answered by IndyT- For Da Ben Dan 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Stop pulling your historical facts from mythology books.
Gay people surround us in this world -- Imagine if your child was born homosexual, you would not want them growing up in an environment where they were taught to hate themselves, would you?
I am gay, and I think everyone else should have a little more understanding, for the people that contribute positively to our society.
If Eve was spawned from Adam's flesh, does that make them related enough, for their breeding to be serious incest?
People like you, always refer to the Bible or God to backup their points about homosexuality. They say that "It's in the Bible, so that it's a sin and therefore, it's bad."
Beside, homosexuality and incest are not the same thing.
2007-03-09 12:22:08 · answer #4 · answered by Kedar 7 · 9⤊ 0⤋
Sorry, incest and state-sponsored discrimination as currently embodied in the STATE-given marriage rights are two separate questions.
I said as much in the last few times you posted this question. Is it true that hypocritical bigots cannot read?
2007-03-09 12:31:19 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Ok I am a non judgmental person , but I think that INCEST it just nasty ! I do believe however that gays and lesbians should be able to marry . If they are not kin , let them be. But INCEST thats just disgusting.
2007-03-09 12:27:02 · answer #6 · answered by pure_sweetness1984 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Stop passing judgement on others, sinner.
2007-03-09 12:33:57 · answer #7 · answered by Syck 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
WHAT?? homosexuality and incest are two differnt things. you are confused and shame on your for trying to confuse us
2007-03-09 12:24:48 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋