http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070309/ap_on_go_co/gingrich_affair_5
2007-03-09 04:16:45 · 13 answers · asked by TaDa 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Elections
The perfect definition of a hypocrit. But I never liked the man, either. Just another reason for me to not like him. . .
2007-03-09 05:55:13 · answer #1 · answered by volleyballchick (cowards block) 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Clinton was NOT pursued for having an affrair. He was pursued for perjury- he lied under oath.
If he was as smart as he would like for you to believe, he would have answered the Monica question with, "Thats none of your business," since it wasn't. But, Clinton is a moron.
2007-03-09 06:35:56 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Both Gingrich and Clinton did something immoral. Clinton also did something illegal. He perjured himself while giving testimony in the Paula Jones case. He was impeached (and lost his license to practice law) because of the perjury.
2007-03-09 04:31:52 · answer #3 · answered by Mr Wisdom 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
And it wasn't his first either! The one Gingrich was trying to get him impeached on happened long before he became president. Gingrich was the Speaker of the House going after Clinton for what he was doing as he spoke! What a hypocrit! Typical Republican!
2007-03-09 04:24:15 · answer #4 · answered by cantcu 7 · 1⤊ 3⤋
When was Clinton pursued for having an affair? Clinton was impeached for perjury and obstruction of justice, not for cheating on his wife.
2007-03-09 04:25:43 · answer #5 · answered by dsl67 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Blah, blah, blah...same as I think of Clinton's affair.
First, I don't care.
Second, what good is it to be one of the most powerful men in the country if you can't use that power to score some young tail?
2007-03-09 04:25:09 · answer #6 · answered by Captain Jack 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I think someone is screwed up on this subject, Clinton was never on trial for having a cigar in Monica's hummm, nor her b.j. he was on trial for perjury, in case you don' know the difference, Gingrich was not on trial nor was he charged for perjury, perjury was the reason the new;s media and congress impeached President Nixon,,REMEMBER??
wHY WAS BILL EXEMPT???
2007-03-09 04:30:31 · answer #7 · answered by james w 3 · 3⤊ 2⤋
He didn't lie under oath and deny it now, did he. He also wasn't playing around in the white house with cigars when he should have been running our country.
2007-03-09 06:20:38 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
He's just as guilty and morally degraded. In his defense he never inserted a cigar into his barely legal fat girlfriend, so thats saying something.
2007-03-09 05:21:13 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't care for him myself, but at least he didn't lie under oath about it.
2007-03-09 05:20:15 · answer #10 · answered by Brad K 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋