Reason enough to sit and watch an otherwise boring flick?
2007-03-09 02:03:36 · 23 answers · asked by Rod Rod Go 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
only if u were the star of the movie. go rod go
2007-03-09 02:07:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Rod,
You're describing a very worthwhile effort.
Reminds me of the Sharon Stone movie a while back...what was the title? Much ado about very, very little flash...in an otherwise unimpressive flick.
I watched it tho...
2007-03-09 10:07:48 · answer #2 · answered by Wolfsburgh 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nicole Kidman: Yes
Ned Beatty: No
2007-03-09 10:06:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Gratuitous nudity...isn't that an oxymoron?
2007-03-09 10:17:13 · answer #4 · answered by tantrickster 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I just rent the DVD and fast forward to the guys showing off their c**ks and azzes.
2007-03-09 10:24:12 · answer #5 · answered by DawnDavenport 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, I go for the storyline, not the nudity. I guess I am square. =)
2007-03-09 10:23:23 · answer #6 · answered by spiritcavegrl 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yeah.
2007-03-09 10:09:27 · answer #7 · answered by Faye ^___^ 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends on who is nude. Sometimes it is the only redeeming thing in the film.
2007-03-09 10:10:30 · answer #8 · answered by ? 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
nope. not a good enough reason to me. if the flick is boring, it remains boring: naked or not...
2007-03-09 10:11:20 · answer #9 · answered by ? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Only if the picture quality is good.
2007-03-09 10:05:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anashuya 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋