because they are no doing enough to stop the terrorists in their country? Is he mad because Pakistan isn't PRE-EMPTIVELY striking terrorists on their border?
Does PRE-EMPTIVE strike not ring a bell??? So, he was for it, then against it, then for it, then against it, then.... he FLIP FLOPS worse than a CARP, even though they are both bottom feeders...
2007-03-09 01:53:06 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Kerry has to keep his name out in front all the time. If he doesn't, he has to fall back on those testosterone shots to maintain his manliness since Theresa took his balls and locked them in the company safe. Besides, you've heard that Democrat Theme Song; "Whatever it is, I'm Against It".
2007-03-09 02:00:03 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Before 9/11, Pakistan would have ranked right behind Afghanistan as a haven for terrorists (followed by Libya - of the 'Axis of Evil', only Iran would have ranked near the top). Without some serious changes in policy, Musharraf had to believe Pakistan would be the next country to be invaded after Afghanistan.
Musharraf has probably done as much as he can to control the threat of terrorist havens in Pakistan considering Musharraf is fairly vulnerable to being removed from power by his own people. None the less, terrorists are still a problem in Pakistan and Musharraf is more vulnerable to being removed from power because of his support for the US.
Regardless of how we might feel about Musharraf's efforts, I'd hestitate to give warplanes to a country that has a serious possibility of being governed by a radical group hostile to the US.
2007-03-09 10:44:10 · answer #2 · answered by Bob G 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gee, that's a tough one. How does someone become a hero by getting two purple hearts from scratches, get discharged after a few months of service because of those purple hearts, and then come home and call the very people he served with baby killers? BECAUSE HE'S A MEMBER OF THE LIBERAL KOOKDOM, which includes our broken media, and everything they do is meant to score political points. It's as simple as that. And if it hurts the country, well, to damn bad. Trying to understand them is an exercise in futility and may cause your head to implode. Give it up.
2007-03-09 10:25:26 · answer #3 · answered by Knowitall 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
John Kerry will always work against what ever is best for America. As long as he sees personal advantage to his pandering of the anti-America crowd this conduct will continue. You see with Kerry it's always all about Kerry
2007-03-09 10:00:33 · answer #4 · answered by espreses@sbcglobal.net 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Perhaps he doesn't think that supplying a nuclear capable military dictatorship with more weapons is the best idea?
2007-03-09 10:02:14 · answer #5 · answered by Morgy 4 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Remember that statement when Musharraf gets overthrown by a Wahabiist coup and we have to shoot down those very same planes.
2007-03-09 09:56:22 · answer #6 · answered by Crabboy4 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
You people use the cutest names for us, how long did that take you to come up with that nickname, a fortnight?
2007-03-09 09:56:52 · answer #7 · answered by ck4829 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋