If you could have the NFL add any rule what rule would you want added?

Question

for example all cheerleaders outfits will be from victoria secret

Answer 1

I would change where the Super Bowl is played. Let a cold-weather city with an outdoor stadium get the game. It's football. It's meant to be played in the cold and snow. Especially after this past SB in Miami's rain.

Answer 2

i could replace the pat/2 element conversions to be like the NCAA, the place the protection can return a blocked pat, or a turnover on the two element conversion for 2 factors. i could additionally get rid of the intense occasion rule. I kinda like a number of the inventive celebrations. Edit: yet another rule i could "replace" is the project equipment. at the instant you get 2 annoying circumstances, and while you're authentic on the two you get a million extra. What if a coach is stable on 3 annoying circumstances and there are extra undesirable calls? Why could be be SOL because of the fact the refs suck. no longer less than i does no longer count variety any the main suitable option annoying circumstances against the coach, yet ideally i could provide communities endless annoying circumstances. some could think of it may decelerate the sport too plenty, yet whilst that does take place then the league needs to hire extra perfect officers to stop making undesirable calls. endless annoying circumstances could nonetheless fee a visit while you're incorrect, so it may in certainty even out on account that maximum communities finally end up utilising their time outs besides. this form a minimum of communities are not penalized for undesirable officiating.

Answer 3

Two rules need changing.
1) It should only cost you a time out on a challenge if the replay shows the call to be correct. If it is inconclusive the call on the field stands but no loss of time out.

2)Spiking the ball to stop the clock is a mockery of the intent of the grounding rule. Why should it be any more legal to intentionally throw the ball where no reciever is close in order to stop the clock than it is to avoid a sack?

Answer 4

Yeah I second on that cheerleader idea, but they need to change the overtime rule's, then go to the roughing the passer rule because as someone already said there were a lot of good sacks that got roughing calls that shouldn't have, then go to the enforcing the rule of defensive holding on the line ( which is not letting an o-linemen get to the next level by holding him that is a penalty and it does need enforced).

Answer 5

The 3 strikes and your out rule.If teams are paying that kind of money they souldn't have to put up with players who repeatedly get caught doing drugs.I mean the players who are doing this are retarded for putting millions of dollars in pay at risk anyways so we won't even be missing anything and maybe some more hard working honest players will get a chance to play instead it's win/win.

Answer 6

All cheerleaders outfits will be from Victoria Secret!

Answer 7

The overtime rule---change it to the same as college football but in order to keep stats from ballooning don't count any offensive or defensive stats in the overtime
The end of games would be a lot more exciting with triple overtimes like college and watching offenses go crazy with a short field and 4 plays.
Start it from the 35 though, that way a three and out isn't a chip shot FG and every TD should be followed by a 2pt conversion

Answer 8

I'd rather them change the way they call a rule instead.. Roughing the Quarterback.

I saw plenty of legitimate sacks get a Roughing the Quarterback call last year. It's PRO Football stop trying to protect players who chose to be there.

Answer 9

Do away with offsetting penalties. I believe that whoever commits an infraction first should be penalized. Or whenever we're talking about 2 penalties, the worst should be imposed, for example: personal foul vs. offsides.

Answer 10

I think they should actually remove a few of the rules like the horse collar rule. They try to protect the players too damn much. Let'em play football.