2007-03-09 01:30:40 · 20 answers · asked by Walter D 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
Unborn humans? Of course they're worried. That's why they try to preserve the environment from corporate polluters who would gladly dump birth-defect causing toxins into the water if there were no repercussions. They push for health care so uninsured and poorly insured families can see to it that pre-natal and post-natal health care is an option that doesn't involve bankruptcy.
If you're comparing environmentalism with abortion, then tell me why Republicans are so worried about Iraq when the 9/11 hijackers came from Saudi Arabia? I really expected something a little bit more insightful...
2007-03-09 01:38:09 · answer #1 · answered by BDOLE 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I cannot speak for unborn Caribou in Alaska, but I am sick of people painting all liberals as baby killers. Just because you are pro choice does not mean you are pro abortion. It means that I choose not to impose my beliefs on another human being, nor will I stand in judgment of her for her decision. That is between her and God, and if you are going to say that it is God's will that she became pregnant, tell that to the guy who probably ran out on her, or maybe raped her, or talked her into having the abortion in the first place. If it was all about nature and God, then it would be an abonimation to him for people to take fertility pills and have invitro fertilization done. Because if it was His will he would have made sure the woman could get pregnant the good old fashion way. It is a double standard and you can't have it both ways, and to assume that all liberals believe the same is idiotic anyway.
2007-03-15 09:43:40 · answer #2 · answered by Penny K 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Because human life is the most expendable thing in nature.
You may kill millions of us and the world will be a better place for that.
The caribou on the other hand cannot do that. They need to be protected by us.
Human existence will be greatly enhanced when we stop thinking that we are the masters of the Earth but rather we are the guardians of Earth and all that are living here.
When the last Caribou or the wale or the tiger or the chipmunk dies, how much time do you think we are left.
"When the last plant and tree dies only then you will realize that money cannot be eaten."
(some great American said that, try to find who)
2007-03-09 01:37:45 · answer #3 · answered by Kimon 7 · 6⤊ 1⤋
The problems in Alaska are far enough off that they don't stare them in the face every day. We need to take some of that money and put it for good use closer to home. Besides, if they didn't put in X amount of funds, then PETA would have a **** fit and sue them. They see it as cheaper to send a few hundred thousand to the caribou than be sued for millions.
2007-03-09 01:35:19 · answer #4 · answered by tinkerbell24 4 · 4⤊ 1⤋
What do you advise by technique of 'no longer human yet'. whether that is not a human foetus then what the hell is it? The mass of cells are alive or they does not be coming up in the womb. It does not rely whether you talk it to be a infant or no longer, it nevertheless has the flair to be born into this international and should no longer be denied the superb suited to exist. Your Q is stupid, completely, and is no longer even in this variety of a sentence no longer to show spelt appropriate, that is in basic terms the infantile concepts of a individual who maintains to be getting used to menstruation no longer to show the excuses in the back of it. existence is existence contained in the womb or exterior. Spontaneous abortion preserve lifeless foetus in maximum circumstances. come back inclusive of your argument once you're grown up adequate to make a clever and ethical assertion approximately it'
2016-09-30 10:37:29 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with the first poster. Why do you think they don't care about unborn humans? I would need specific examples. Of course, you probably wouldn't like me because I donate more of my money to animal charities than I do to human ones.
2007-03-09 01:37:04 · answer #6 · answered by They call me ... Trixie. 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Short answer: you've been mislead about what liberals believe.
I'd suggest that you look at what the majority of liberals think about ANWAR.
2007-03-09 01:38:33 · answer #7 · answered by Jay 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I worry about both. I also don't want a human being born into a world full of pollution and war, why aren't you worried about that too?
2007-03-09 01:58:32 · answer #8 · answered by ck4829 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
For all those bleeding hearts that are pro-choice, does that mean partial birth abortions too. Who gets the body?
2007-03-16 07:13:41 · answer #9 · answered by edward m 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow, so many missed the POINT in this question !!
I think it's because fetuses don't make cute and adorable posters, and caribou do...
And caribou are NOT an endangered species
2007-03-09 01:40:47 · answer #10 · answered by mariner31 7 · 8⤊ 3⤋