I'm 100% in favor! I'm afraid I don't see the down side.
People will go out more after supper. Mostly, they'll walk, won't they? Or do things around the property. If they want to drive, they can do that right now, even without daylight time, by turning on their headlights!
If they do drive, there will be fewer accidents because they won't be going in the dark.
Some say they'd use air conditioning more, but I think the opposite is the case (assuming it's warm in late March, which considering this week's weather is hardly a certainty). If they go out and it's warm, A/C is not used. If they stay in, however, they might.
2007-03-09 02:06:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anne Marie 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
How this will save energy is debatable. I personally wonder if this change increases the chance people will turn on lights early and forget to turn them off when they leave the house (as it will be light out and not obvious). One thing is certain though, with daylight savings people get out and do more. This means they burn more gas. Like most things in the 2005 Energy Bill, this change is really about oil companies selling more gas. It's sad to see such an important issue (energy efficiency) manipulated by those that have little concern for conservation and making it appear as if school children are now in the dark in the name of conservation when they are acutually in the dark in the name of profit.
2007-03-10 13:57:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Wilderness Rules 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
There have been a lot of research studies that have shown that it will save energy. I guess that most American's stay at home after work in the evenings... and if it's light outside, they don't need to turn on the lights. However, moving Daylight Savings Time is a pretty big change.
2007-03-09 02:17:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by Laura M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
What I would think is that in the morning you don't really need to turn on the lights, and at night you'll use the lights less time, since there's more sun during the day...ambiguity in the air...
2007-03-09 01:38:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I have never seen any proof that time change actually saves energy.
Also, always have to stop and think, now is it 1hour or 2 hours different in Arizona from Alaska when wanting to call gramma. And is she 2 hours ahead of us or two hours behind us.
2007-03-10 05:48:03
·
answer #5
·
answered by ginger 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've never understood the logic of daylight savings. It just shifts the time you need to turn on your lights.
2007-03-09 03:44:57
·
answer #6
·
answered by bugs280 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
who cares..more light during the summer hours.seems like it would be good season for medical cannabis growers yes yes yes
2007-03-09 02:09:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Norweiginwood420 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think it will save more engergy.
2007-03-09 01:44:20
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i guess it really does since they are rearranging something we have been doing forever
2007-03-09 01:40:37
·
answer #9
·
answered by live in the magic of life 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
good point
2007-03-09 14:02:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋