Its human nature to change the subject when you cannot defend or explain the conduct.
Its a form of fallacious argumentation in terms of formal logic...
And let's face it the few Bush supporters left, have a lot of subject-changing to do now don't they?
For those who are "true Republicans" or "Don't change the subject" then step up to the plate on these subjects for starters:
1) he lied about weapons of mass destruction
2) he lied about links between Al Qaeda and Hussein
3) he lied about adequately arming and protecting our troops
4) he lied about the war to be financed by Iraqi oil
5) he lied about big corrupt businesses feeding at the public trough (among them Haliburton and Carlisle group in which he and Cheney have interests)
6) he lied about invading citizens privacy
7) he lied about his tax cuts
8) he lied about his national guard service
9) he lied about his prior alcohol and drug use
10) he lied about supporting, defending and being bound by the US Constitution
11) he lied about being bound by the Geneva Convention
12) he lied about violating the sovereignty of our allies (moving prisoners onto their territory by secret flights to secret locations without informing the governments whose territory he's entered)
12) he lied about the use of torture
13) he lied about deliberately leaking information that outed Valerie Plame.
14) he lied about the intent and use of his faith-based initiatives.
15) he has lied about the number of national security letters issued which were used to obtain citizens phone and bank records.
16) He lied about the medical care our troops are receiving when they come home wounded.
17) he lied about seeking energy independence
18) he lied about global warming (largely ordering the government to ignore the issue and suppressing science on it).
19) he has allowed the decline of national parks and resources.
20) lied about the nature of prescription drug coverage under medicare.
21) not addressed the medicare funding crisis.
22) not addressed the social security funding crisis.
23) it is now becoming evident that he has attempted to push US attorneys to improperly indict or prosecute Democrats for political reasons.
2007-03-09 01:11:08
·
answer #1
·
answered by William E 5
·
1⤊
3⤋
What "scandals" are you talking about? Most of these supposed scandals like "he lied about WMDs" are semantics (because we've found hundreds of tons of WMDs, for example) or spin-doctored rhetoric.
That other William above me keeps repeating the same old lies. It grows tiresome, and contrary to liberal popular belief, if you tell a lie often enough IT DOES NOT turn into a fact.
2007-03-12 11:52:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
accusations made against Bush on this forum are not based on facts it is rhetoric made up by liberal fanatics that can not base a single answer or question on a provable fact. the knowledge that liberals display about what they think is fact reminds me of a high school rumor run amuck
2007-03-09 09:25:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by deedee2qu 3
·
2⤊
2⤋
why do non-bush supporters on here ask questions that dont have any bearing on anything?...the subject is being changed to something pertiant....
2007-03-09 09:10:22
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
1⤋
Because we're tired of the same old crackpot conspiracy theories and half-truths blathered out by Bush-haters.
2007-03-09 09:10:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 6
·
4⤊
2⤋
O.K bring up a subject and see if we change it. This is a ridicules question.
2007-03-09 09:14:30
·
answer #6
·
answered by lsuballs 3
·
1⤊
1⤋
how come liberals change the subject when i ask what bill clinton did with a cigar?
2007-03-09 09:22:38
·
answer #7
·
answered by Matt 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
republicans are generally fascists and self serving ...
democrats are generally self serving and self righteous...I guess most people are though...bush is bad enuf, but cheney is the lord of hell!...my answer makes little sense really, yet it is a chance to express my disapproval of those who stole the elections in FL...it is likely that history will show the corruption in the souls of these "christians in action"...
2007-03-09 09:15:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by cvw666 1
·
1⤊
4⤋
Selective amnesia - "Amnesia about particular events that is very convenient for the person who cannot remember."
http://www.wordwebonline.com/en/SELECTIVEAMNESIA
2007-03-09 10:24:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
I take exception to your bland statement....a true Republican will step up to the plate every time!!!!!
2007-03-09 09:09:55
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
1⤋