A bully and a hypocrite. Therefore a man with no integrity but full of aggression for power. Enough said?.
2007-03-09 00:37:17
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
Newt Gingrich and the Republican party from the time they took power have succeeded in "dumbing" down the majority of the masses to the point that most of their followers do not read enough from a variety of sources and only go with sound bytes from their favorites Newsmax, the Washington Times, their talk show hosts and Faux News.
The people have allowed people like "eye of Newt" to lead them around by the rings in their noses and listen to their vitriol even in the face of contradictory evidence to the party line. This is sad. This has what has allowed a run away Presidency with no brakes on that train at all. A President that does not listen to the people who put in him the job.
2007-03-09 01:02:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by thequeenreigns 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
properly, sure, he can end the job of destroying u . s . -- with the intention that we haven't any center type, purely thousands of tens of millions human beings starving to lack of existence contained in the streets, at the same time as 0.a million% own each little thing. His settlement ON u . s . exceeded -- because democratic electorate stayed homestead. That replaced into merely between the series of Republican strikes that has further about the present economic disaster, and the lengthy-status disappearance of a comfortable center type (now to not indicate environmental destruction). The questions isn't even if, with a compliant Congress, Newt can get his time table by, the question is why might want to everybody vote for an time table that impoverishes ninety 9.9% of the inhabitants, and leaves us no longer something positioned poisonous water to drink, and deadly sludge to respire?
2016-10-17 11:20:53
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I care about only one thing: judicial activism. If Newt will address that issue to my satisfaction -- which includes acknowledging that the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Bush v. Gore was a fiasco -- then I'll vote for him irregardless of his adultery.
2007-03-09 00:41:21
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well, I thought highly of Newt until I heard this. I hope he's not thinking of running for the Presidency now.
2007-03-09 00:36:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by Robby's Girl 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
Both the irony and the hypocricy and dumbfounding.
It is worse than you think, as there is no bottom to this abyss we have fallen into
2007-03-09 00:42:17
·
answer #6
·
answered by Experto Credo 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
I think he is the single most qualified person to be President that this country has seen since Regan.
2007-03-09 00:39:20
·
answer #7
·
answered by Delphi 4
·
2⤊
0⤋
the new Newt is better than the old one.
2007-03-09 01:12:31
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Old news, he's a has been.
2007-03-09 00:40:02
·
answer #9
·
answered by True Patriot 3
·
1⤊
0⤋