.....maybe it would evolve into a bacteria again and reproduce
asexually!
2007-03-09 00:23:35 · 18 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
Indeed. That is why hetrosexuality is allowed to exist.
2007-03-09 00:27:52 · answer #1 · answered by nycguy10002 7 · 7⤊ 1⤋
I'm pretty sure that we could still understand that the species needed to reproduce etc and could set up a program like an "Egg and Sperm musical chairs".
You're making the mistake of thinking that all gay and lesbian people don't want to have children. We might not want to have sex with the same sex but that doesn't mean that we can't or can't use artificial insemination if need be. Straight people really seem to think that they're indispensable.
Cheers,
2007-03-09 09:51:07 · answer #2 · answered by Gene M 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Being homosexual does not mean we are incapable of reproduction with the opposite sex, it just means we don't have an emotional or physical attraction.
You and others who have asked this don't seem to understand. We can, if need be, reproduce with the opposite sex as a matter of survival, so why do people like you miss this basic reality?
Lord give me patience so that I may not have to suffer such fools.
2007-03-09 09:25:38 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
That's the real point isn't it, that the human race isn't exclusively inclined to either heterosexuality or homosexuality? Those "what if" scenarios don't change a thing.
2007-03-09 09:01:05 · answer #4 · answered by IndyT- For Da Ben Dan 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Not really. Many Lesbians want to have children and do so.
I have come to the opinion that even if a gal is a lesbian she seems to have a desire to also have children at some point. May have something to do with her chemical makeup. Would be neat to research that.
2007-03-09 09:00:57 · answer #5 · answered by dragon 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There needs to be more homosexuals to keep the human race from overpopulating the world.
2007-03-09 09:16:00 · answer #6 · answered by james B 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Wouldn't the human race be short lived if it was all included to masturbate?
Oops.... More are, more than are gay, I'm sure. We're still here.
There are people who are celebate by choice, who don't want children, who are asexual.... We're still here.
2007-03-09 08:38:41 · answer #7 · answered by Meg W 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Sure it would, if EVERYONE was homosexually inclined. But to be honest, what difference does that make?
2007-03-09 08:49:57 · answer #8 · answered by Tikhacoffee/MisterMoo 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
We are facing an over population crisis, so maybe we should have some more homosexual relationships. Too many babies as it is.
B
2007-03-09 09:24:25 · answer #9 · answered by Bacchus 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Since the male-female interaction only needs to happen every few years, no,,,, I think we could survive. Most gay men that I know 'could' sleep with a woman every 2 or 4 years, if they needed to.
2007-03-09 08:27:29 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
Your very original. You think that up your self or cop that from the 100 others people who say it everyday.
2007-03-09 08:26:04 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋