Republicans, can't live with 'em, and can't live without 'em.
2007-03-09 00:01:43 · 10 answers · asked by Firesidechat 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I use the hyperbole because the Republicans appeal to the conservative fundamentalist right over family values while, at least in Newt's case, having none of their own. Newt is a nasty man.
2007-03-09 00:11:27 · update #1
He is what is typical of the Republican leadership. The " Do as I say, not as I do" crowd. Ironic isn't it, he was screaming about Clinton and his blowj*b, yet there he was catting around. The guy that was to replace him as Speaker Bob Livingston was having an affair, Henry Hyde also one of the vitriolic masses was having an affair at the same time.
Newt went on further to say that he should not be looked at as hypocritical because he was going after Clinton because of the lie under oath, yet he is still among the same masses that want Libby to be pardoned for lying under oath. HUH!?!
God, they disgust me.
Give me a politician who does not try to make himself out to be like Jesus and God rolled into because of his/her purity. Just someone who can string 2 coherent sentences together and can actually know the job, if not can ask questions and understand the answer and take and follow advice.
2007-03-09 00:28:21 · answer #1 · answered by thequeenreigns 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Sure he is. Just like Bill Clinton who also hung his religion on his sleeve for public approval. However he is also the most qualified person to be the next President of the United States. The biggest issue in this country's future is the fact that Social Security will no longer be subsidizing Federal deficits by 2017. Which means we need to get the federal budget under control fast. Gingrich was the guy who kept the federal spending issue on the table during his term as Speaker, and was willing to take heat for unpopular steps needed to get the job done. He is the one candidate who can claim that he was instrumental in the federal budget surpluses of the 90's and he is the one who is best qualified to get the budget under control now. Candidates who are untested amateurs (like the current President) such as Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton certainly will not bring the budget under control.
2007-03-09 00:27:36 · answer #2 · answered by DocWilsonPP22 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Rush Limbaugh campaigns against drug dealers and he gets caught with drugs. Newt admits to an affair. Tim Haggard admits to have affair with gay man and the list goes on. The Republican Party the party of "family values" GOP style.
I wonder how Fox News will treat this the story on Newt?
2007-03-09 00:14:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
No, he is just another politician caught in a lie. It is not necessary to use hyperbole like "bible banging adulterous demagogue".
2007-03-09 00:07:10 · answer #4 · answered by vegaswoman 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Short answer: yes. Mark Foley, Fred Ney, Newt, Libby... Oh! How they love to push their moral and ethical agenda!
2007-03-09 00:08:39 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
Oh! let us speak of Ted kennedy, Robert Kennedy, Clinton...... need I go on?????? Democrats....can live w/o them!
2007-03-09 01:14:37 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes he is and JFK sent Jackie home early from their honeymoon so he could have 3-some with 2 women. Get over yourselves. Liberals and their tolerance. I love it.
2007-03-09 00:12:20 · answer #7 · answered by archangel72901 4 · 3⤊ 3⤋
He served his wife divorce papers while she was in the hospital being treated for cancer. What a special guy.
2007-03-09 00:06:30 · answer #8 · answered by marie 7 · 1⤊ 5⤋
Yes, he is a typical republican.
2007-03-09 00:12:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
you have to ask?
LOL
2007-03-09 00:15:28 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋