English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

So why is it only cigarettes that are banned from public places......shouldnt Maccie D's be banned for obesity drink for acoholism and drink driving, mobile phones in cars and phones and masks for brain tumours. petrol for its fumes which also cause respiratory problems

2007-03-08 21:50:49 · 8 answers · asked by sylvie c 4 in Cars & Transportation Other - Cars & Transportation

No it is a question why if they ban cigarettes have the other items mentioned not also been banned

2007-03-09 01:22:53 · update #1

8 answers

Your question is a statement - an unclear one at that.

2007-03-08 21:54:52 · answer #1 · answered by McQ 3 · 1 0

Everything in moderation I guess, a maccies now and then wont do you any harm or the people around you, nor does the occasional alcoholic drink, mobile phones are ok as long as you aren't on them all day and you cant get addicted to mobiles. Car fumes are quite bad but we all need are cars where as you dont need to smoke.

2007-03-08 22:05:53 · answer #2 · answered by bez 4 · 0 0

Not at all. People are responsible for their own actions. If i choose to smoke, then i choose to rot my lungs. If i choose to drink then i choose cirrhosis of the liver and so on. Then we have fuel being emitted by cars. Heck, if people were so worried then they would catch a train or walk to work. Noone cares anymore. We do what we see fit because we are all so self absorbed these days. Of course the media feeds off of this and it only makes it worse.

But in the end people have to choose for themselves. Noone can do that for them. Banning these things wont help. How many people do we all know out there that break the law just for the sake of their own gratification? Too many in my point of view. So let it be. If you are so worried about it try petitioning and then lobbying your local government. Only when the public speak up (and there has to be ALOT of them) will the tards in politics take attention.

2007-03-08 21:57:57 · answer #3 · answered by ~*Renaissance*~ 3 · 0 0

you know if they start banning the cell phone in car, an the drinking,,,an then tell the they could only drive their car so many days a week,,,, they not like it,,,, ty for putting the shoe on the other foot,,,,,,an yes i am a smoker, an tire of them telling me , all the bad thing wrong with smokeing, honest i proble die from so one one a cell phone ,honest dont people know one car put out more ,than 10 carten of cig,,,i think we need to start banned the cell, an drinking,then tell them how long they can driver their car per week,

2007-03-08 22:51:03 · answer #4 · answered by ghostwalker077 6 · 0 0

The police are actually not above the regulation. they'd desire to obay each and every of the regulations and regulations with reference using. In an emergency, they are in a position to take a pink site visitors gentle as proceed with warning, yet not endanger different highway clientele, consisting of pedestrians. All police automobiles, to the best of my awareness, are equipped with hands loose communications, or a 2nd officer as passenger to act as navigator via telephone links. There would desire to be no clarification for any police officer to apply a cellular telephone together as using.

2016-12-18 09:07:21 · answer #5 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Someone eating a mcdonalds doesnt make me fat!

someone smoking near me can give me cancer.

Nothing needs banning, people just need more self control, then they would get drunk and drive, or fat etc

2007-03-08 21:56:03 · answer #6 · answered by Ni 4 · 1 0

It's a wonder we can still survive the world we've created. What a mess, something has to give ...

2007-03-08 21:55:12 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

no my love its just a easy way of getting more taxes out of u and u dont have leg to stand on

2007-03-11 22:59:03 · answer #8 · answered by sassa 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers