Since you "believe" (or at least say you believe) there were no WMD in Iraq, will you call nancy pelosi either an idiot, or a liar, and say she had been wasting taxpayer money for over ten years (at the time of this quote)
READ HER QUOTE!!!!!
"As a member of the House Intelligence Committee, I am keenly aware that the proliferation of chemical and biological weapons is an issue of grave importance to all nations. Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Congresswoman Nancy Pelosi (Democrat, California)
Statement on US Led Military Strike Against Iraq
December 16, 1998
http://www.house.gov/pelosi/priraq1.htm?
2007-03-08
16:16:42
·
11 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Military
Oh... hey! That was the quote she gave right before we attacked Iraq in 1998! And the Clinton military did such a good job of degrading their ability to manufacture WMD that they weren't able to make any more by the time we invaded!
So... I'm sorry. What's your point?
2007-03-08 21:44:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by mykll42 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
In response to some answers: how exactly did Bush influence her speech a full two years before he was even elected?
It looks like the democrats have changed their minds, and while that's fine, it's not okay that they're blaming the President for what they decided years ago. It's no one's fault but her own if she made an uninformed decision during the Clinton administration.
Also, when Clinton signed the Iraq Liberation Bill, I'm pretty sure he had no intention of actually following through with it. He was too busy trying to set up for a smooth transition with Gore.
2007-03-08 18:24:18
·
answer #2
·
answered by DOOM 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Hey libs Bush was not president in 98 Clinton was. Nancy Pelosi is doing the usual liberal thing and adjusting her ideas to the current polls. It's like training animals to do things on command. The media creates a poll to back a position and then tells the democrats so they will do what the polls indicates will be popular.
2007-03-08 17:11:14
·
answer #3
·
answered by mr conservative 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
Nancy Pelosi just like other Democrats voted for the invasion of Iraq but are now reverting what they have voted for.
2007-03-08 16:21:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
i do no longer think of inquiring for congressional expenditures to be positioned on line is relatively an occasion of 'the democratic lifestyle of corruption'? She is the guy who asked that they be positioned on line, relatively than revealed in a splash e book that noone might ever see. i think of the flora are ridiculous, yet there are worse issues in there. like the handfuls and dozens of pages exhibiting that my tax money is going to pay team individuals pupil loan money each and each month!!@$#$!!! Whose pupil loans are starting to be paid each and each month and why the hell would be unable to I in basic terms take my tax money to pay my own rattling pupil loans? Its unlike those persons are completely disabled or coaching underprivileged babies or something, they're on their thank you to extraordinarily first rate careers i might guess, with unfastened flora, food and bottled water obtainable every time they like lol. Why the hell am I determining to purchase those peoples very own debt?
2016-09-30 10:22:23
·
answer #5
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
They won't give credence to the quote. Their job is to attack while bearing no responsibility at all. "Bush joined the National Guard to avoid going to Vietnam" is all you heard from them, but it was okay for Clinton to move to another country. "Bush did drugs in college!" is what they scream, but there is no actual proof and where is the outcry about Obama and his cocaine use, which he admitted to. Hypocrites and haters, the far left.
2007-03-08 16:29:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by rkmy78 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Nancy Pelosi, another "JOKE" made in America
2007-03-08 16:26:30
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
These people are not intentionally lying. They are reading from information they are given. Most of them do not even have access to classified information. So they make their statements from the information that is given to them. End of story.
2007-03-08 17:11:01
·
answer #8
·
answered by Gettin_by 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neither. No one disputes Saddam's history. What we dispute is Bush's rush and failure to listen to the UN inspectors. They ask him for 6 more months after Saddam had opened up previous off-limit places to them. I suspect you don't want truth though...
2007-03-09 17:31:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by BeachBum 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Thankfully I was never taken in by her. I live in California where we see way too much stupidity by Democrats for any of us not already one to get sucked in.
2007-03-08 16:21:03
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋