Do you think the war in Iraq is based on the lies of WMD or the lies of 911??

Answer 1

Both,Bush administration knew that Sadam didn't have anything to do with 9/11.As for the WMD - UN inspectors where there before the war started and didn't find anything.Both were bald lies

Answer 2

Neither, I think the Iraq war is being fought because Saddam could not abide by the sanctions put on him by the UN. If he had let the inspectors do their jobs he would still be alive and probably still be in power. There were no "lies" about WMD that I can see. Every previous administration had the same intelligence reports that GW had and even the democrats voted to invade based on the intelligence. The fact that there was no widespread production or stockpiles of WMD does not mean anyone lied. Also keep in mind that there were WMD's found but they were not in the quantities or qualities that intelligence reported. Saddam himself could have averted this whole conflict if he would have abided by the rules set forth not by the U.S., but by the paper tiger known as the U.N. The real shame is that while the U.N. is good at issuing sanctions and verdicts, they lack the fortitude to actually enforce anything. As usual it is up to the United States to take care of itself and it's allies. By allies I mean real allies not people such as the French.

Answer 3

You're right there have been alot of lies about WMD's and 911. People lie and say that Saddam never had WMD's. People lie and say that the US government masterminded 911. People also lie and say that President Bush claimed that Saddam had something to do with 911. People also lie and say that President Bush made up the evidence about WMD's. You are right there have been alot of lies about WMD's and 911 but I don't think the war was based on any of these lies.

Answer 4

You know there has been so much come out in the media, one person has been found guilty for perjury and other things to cover up a leak, If the President did know that there were no WMD's in Iraq, then he has lied to the American people. If he told an untruth, he should admit it.
I don't follow you on lies of 911. It happened and 3000 died from it.

Answer 5

Both. There turned out to be no WMD, and although Sadamm was a jerk, the connection that the administration made between him & Al Qaeda was pure fabrication.
The result is we moved valuable resources from Afghanistan where we still have plenty of work to do and were totally right to invade, and also now when a real threat exists (Iran), we have difficulty building a coalition because the world cannot trust the Bush Administration.

Answer 6

Without the 911 lies, the WMD lies would never have worked.

now it seams that every muslim alive is a terrorist.

no wonder people from other countries think we are stupid. the majority of americans live their lives in fear.

watchout there is a boogieman under your bed. and he's a muslim!!

good luck and God bless.

Answer 7

You're one to talk about lies, Brenda/Nancy/Lisa/Jazmine/Katrina/Sybil, what with your spamming, 37 personalities and your "husband in Iraq" that is no longer mentioned. After the stunts you have pulled on here, nothing you say has credibility anymore.

Answer 8

No they are just tools. What is happening is that Bush is securing the control of oil that American will need to sustain our suburban lifestyle. That is why Chaney said that this war would last longer then our lifetime.

Answer 9

The lies of WMD.

Answer 10

more WMD but this "war" is completely about oil and really not much more. The only reason that countries get into war is for the sake of their own countries well being.