2007-03-08 15:05:45 · 13 answers · asked by Matt 5 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
No. Avoiding service in and of itself isn't what makes a chickenhawk. What makes a chickenhawk is avoiding service WHILE cheering on a war that you are eligible to fight in but find a way not to. Supporting the war is the "hawk" part, avoiding it is the "chicken" part. Clinton was a chickendove.
2007-03-08 15:13:21 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Chickenhawk is a great book about UH1 pilots in Vietnam. Clinton is just a scurrilous moron.
2007-03-08 23:25:03 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
"By chickenhawk, do you mean a homosexual that chases after younger (legal-age) men ?"
Nope, those are Republican Senators from Florida. Oops, nope, that's wrong, some of those weren't legal age.
2007-03-08 23:21:03 · answer #3 · answered by Q S B 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
By chickenhawk, do you mean a homosexual that chases after younger (legal-age) men ?
;-0
2007-03-08 23:09:50 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
No, he did not support the Vietnam war. A chickenhwawk supports the war but won't serve.
2007-03-08 23:08:46 · answer #5 · answered by Timothy M 5 · 4⤊ 1⤋
Nope...no more than dumbya and cheney....just because of his political affiliation does not make his actions any worse than the current idiots in the white house.
2007-03-08 23:15:46 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
No he wasn't. He was not much of a hawk at all, but rather a huggy bear.
2007-03-08 23:13:57 · answer #7 · answered by Zelda Hunter 7 · 2⤊ 2⤋
He was better than the dumb-cluck that Bush turned out to be.
2007-03-08 23:12:29 · answer #8 · answered by Joseph, II 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
no, he exercised his libido in the usual way. Not by invading other countries.
2007-03-08 23:13:20 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
No, I think he was more of a cigar.
2007-03-08 23:14:18 · answer #10 · answered by az 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋