Would you rather have 1 leg shorter than the other or 1 arm shorter than the other?

Answer 1

I know everyone's saying arm, but I'm gonna go out on a limb here (no pun intended) and say I'd rather have 1 leg shorter. You ever see a guy limping around? People are more delicate around him, kinda lookin out, make sure he gets through the door ok. They'll step out of the way on a sidewalk first. There are lots of little hidden benefits.

Answer 2

1 arm shorter because if a leg was shorter it would be hard to walk!

Answer 3

Arm, because a shorter leg would cause a limp and be very obvious.

Answer 4

It is true that everyone has one arm and one leg slightly shorter than the other...but I would rather have one arm shorter, what would it hurt, really? I would also rather be deaf than blind.

Answer 5

well sorry tobe the one to tell you that every one have one shrt arm and one short leg it may no tbe very noticeable but it is so, but if it was noticeable I would rather have a short arm cause a short leg can be expenxive and can also cause other health problems with all that weight come down on that short leg and thenu would also have to buy special shoes , just give me the short arm if I have to have one

Answer 6

One arm shorter. It would be less noticeable, wouldn't have problems with jeans or walking with a limp.

Answer 7

I'll take the arm.

My uncle had that, as a result of awar injury, and it didn't seem to mess him up that much.

I would think that walking would become an issue if it were the legs...

Answer 8

I would go for arm. I think that the leg may cause some walking problems, or hip and back problems.

Answer 9

definately arm. id have a limp if i had a leg shorter

Answer 10

Much less problems with one arm shorter because arms are not weight-bearing.