I am looking to buy a new car and I've gotten it down to three choices, I could get a 1.) 2006 Cobalt with 17000 miles on it fully loaded with everything(sunroof, spoiler, leater heated seats...) 14500 dollars 2.) I could get a brand new cobalt with everything, plus remote start which runs 18500 or I could get the mazda 6 grand touring which is 21000 I'm having hard time choosing. Help, give me all the info you can to convince me what to buy!
2007-03-08 13:51:23 · 3 answers · asked by Just Curious 1 in Cars & Transportation ➔ Buying & Selling
It depends on what is most important to you.
1. The Mazda 6 is a lot better car than the Cobalt.
2. The Cobalt should be compared to the Mazda 3.
3. The Mazda 6 should be compared to the Malibu.
4. Now that we have established that you are not comparing apples to apples.
5. If price is most important- Get the used Cobalt with an extended warranty to cover out to 10yrs-100K miles, will end up around $16K which will be around $320 a month on conventional rates.
6. If you like the Cobalt and can spend up to $21K, cheack out the 2007 Cobalt SS. That is a fun car to drive!
7. But if you are looking for something functional with style that will last 8+ yrs. Buy the Mazda 6! For approx. $420 a month.
2007-03-08 16:47:08 · answer #1 · answered by Jeremy P 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My brother were given an 08 Mazda 3. Its been fairly reliable and hasn't had a difficulty. He offered it at the same time as it had 40 2,000 miles and now hes at fifty 2,000. no longer something broke down and its only a ey reliable vehicle. Then i purchased myself a used 2009 Mazda 6. i have purely had for an afternoon and battery went out and their giving me a alternative vehicle already. Its complicated because Mazdas are particularly in between reliability and a lemon. yet when I were you, i might want to bypass for the Mazda 3. so a lengthy way those who owned it, declare its highly reliable. Chevy Colbalt is a vehicle to circumvent. it may well be lower priced besides the undeniable fact that the reason being because its unreliable. customer comments gave the Colbalt a low score and thanks to low revenues the Colbalt is already decrease from production. because, GM isn't on the point yet the position they could construct extra useful autos, yet construct extra useful trucks. the purely sturdy section about Colbalts is their a relations manufacturers so parts are more lower priced.
2016-10-17 11:16:11 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
dont waste your coin on the cobalts. mazda builds a better car. if you're looking for bang for your buck, check out a new vw rabbit.
2007-03-08 13:55:36 · answer #3 · answered by schizophreniabeatsdiningalone 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋