English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I defaulted on my student loans in later 2005. In early 2006, I decided to rehabilitate my student loans.

The detail was as such: After making a fair down payment amount (I paid $7,000), I would be entered into the rehab program. I would then make 9 consecutive payments of a fair amount (I paid $200 a month), the loan would be considered rehabilitated and be eligible for consolidation. Also, ALL negative information reported to the credit bureaus would be expunged from my credit report.
I fulfilled all parts of the rehabilitation program. My loan was purchased back by the guaranty agency and the guarantor removed the default from my credit record. . However, the loan servicing agency that serviced the original loan refuses to remove the deragatory data from my report. I have disputed the information through all 3 credit bureaus to no avail. I have spoken with the Dept of Ed and they have stated that the deragatory information should be removed.
Any advice? I'm really lost!

2007-03-08 13:32:48 · 3 answers · asked by Daniel M 2 in Education & Reference Financial Aid

3 answers

I'm sorry that this happened to you. You did everything right and acted responsibly by completing the program. You should get credit for that (literally!).

In general, when you dispute a negative item on your credit report, the "burden of proof" is on the creditor to prove that that negative item is legitimate. If they don't do this within a certain number of days, the item is typically removed from your credit report. Have you checked lately?

If the problem still exists, I would recommend contacting the Department of Education Ombudsman: http://ombudsman.ed.gov/ . Their role is to mediate exactly these types of situations. I think it will work in your favor that both your guarantor and the DoE think that you the derogatory items should be removed.

2007-03-09 04:50:53 · answer #1 · answered by FinAidGrrl 5 · 2 0

It does not make sense to me that they would have a due date & then allow for 15 days after due date & still call that an on-time payment my guess is that you misunderstood something & paid past the due date with paying 1-15 days past the due-date, then it was not counted "on time" even though it would not have reported to credit bureau as a late payment it may be that the payment is due on the due date, but they will not charge you past-due fees or send you to collections unless you are over 15 days past the due date --- but anything past the actual due date would still be not-on-time it would be easy to see how the lender would see this as not making consistent monthly payments

2016-03-28 23:52:02 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

f

2016-04-12 09:01:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers