Intelligent Design or Evolution?

Question

"Darwiniacs do not have a single observable example of one species evolving into another by the Darwinian mechanism of variation and selection. All they have is a story. It is a story that inspires fanatical devotion from the cult simply because their story excludes a creator. They have seized upon something that looks like progress from primitive life forms to more complex life forms and invented a story to explain how the various categories of animals originated. But animal sequences do not prove that the Darwinian mechanism of natural selection caused the similarities. It is just as likely that the similarities are proof of intelligent design, creationism, or the Giant Raccoon's Flatulence theory. The animal-sequence drawings allegedly demonstrating evolution by showing, for example, a little runt horse gradually becoming a grand stallion, are just that: drawings."

"Nor are intelligent design scientists looking at things they can't explain: Quite the opposite. They are looking at things they can explain but which Darwin didn't even know about, like the internal mechanism of the cell, and saying, That wasn't created by natural selection—that required high-tech engineering. By contrast, the evolution cult members look at things they can't explain and say, We can't explain it, but the one thing we do know is that there is no intelligence in the universe. It must have been random chance, or it's not "science."

Answer 1

I agree with most of what you said. I do not know why people push the evolution theory on everyone. Its not a proven theory so why all the monkey business? Its not like if scientist have never been wrong!!!

If all animals evolve why are we the only ones that evolved leaps and bounds ahead of all other species?

Why do we still have monkeys? shouldn't they all be walking erect by now?

Answer 2

Evolution does not exclude a Creator. It does not include a Creator either, since it is science. No scientific work involves a Creator one way or the other, since the supernatural falls outside the purview of science. Which is why "intelligent design scientists" is a contradiction in terms. In any case, the fact of Creation has nothing to do with the evolution of species, which didn't even begin until billions of years after the universe was created.
.

Answer 3

"Darwiniacs do not have a single observable example of one species evolving into another by the Darwinian mechanism of variation and selection"

You started right off with a falsehood. Creationists enjoy saying that there is no evidence for evolution, but that is simply a blatant lie.

In the meantime, there is absolutely no evidence that a designer exists, nor that an intentional design process could ever produce anything anywhere near as complex as life. It is only human arrogance that keeps people from recognizing the fact that intentional design only produces relatively simple things, while all of the really complex things around us are the product of nonintentional processes.

Referring to scientists as "evolution cult members" reveals that you are not interested in being honest, but only came here to attack people. Referring to evolution as "random chance" reveals that you're completely ignorant on the topic and have made no effort whatsoever to know what you're talking about before you launched this attack.

In short, this question is ignorant, arrogant, childish, and utterly dishonest. Nice job representing creationists!

Answer 4

The internal mechanism of the cell is more proof of evolution than any fossil record. Our bodies, the web of life, these things only barely work, they are not efficient, they are not perfect, they just work. Darwin spoke of natural selection, there is more to evolution than just that. Are you actually trying to argue that animals don't change, adapt, learn? Intelligent Design is just the last desperate attempt to save a sinking ship. Most respectable scientists just laugh at it, this one to, ha.

Answer 5

smart layout is a incorrect, non medical concept. Why might want to there be distinctive genetic defects in a designed being. Does god on occasion lose the preparation guide? identity is a religious perspective, as, unlike evolution or the different medical concept, it replaced into created subjectively, with its creators conforming their reasoning to a pre-present perception. technological awareness is talked about objectively, with data filling in a sparkling slate to furnish solutions. The outcome of including identity in colleges will be that it will create the phantasm that it has medical backing. this may decelerate the upward thrust in secular/basic sense human beings

Answer 6

The likelihood of the formation of life from inanimate matter is one to a number with 40 thousand [zeros] after it. It is enough to bury Darwin and the whole theory of evolution. There was no primordial soup, neither on this planet nor on any other, and if the beginnings of life were not random they must therefore have been the product of purposeful intelligence. - Sir Fredrick Hoyle, Nature Nov. 1981

When it comes to the origins of life there are only two possibilities: Creation or spontaneous generation. There is no third way. Spontaneous generation was disproved hundreds of years ago, but that leads us to only one other conclusion, that of supernatural creation. We cannot accept that on philosophical grounds; therefore, we choose to believe the impossible. That life arose from spontaneous chance. - George Wald, "The Origin of Life", Scientific American May 1954

Genes and enzymes are linked together in a living cell--two interlocking systems, each supporting the other. It is difficult to see how either could manage alone. Yet if we are to avoid invoking either a Creator of a very large improbability, we must accept that one occured before the other in the origin of life. But which one was it? We are left with an ancient riddle: Which came first, the chicken or the egg? - Robert Shapiro

Answer 7

There have been no observations of one species evolving into another by intelligent design, either. And every proposed example of irreducible complexity has been disproved.

Answer 8

God works in mysterious ways!!!

I am a believer in Creation AND Evolution as they seem to compliment each other perfectly! I am always impressed with the way God presents himself in our life... the author of life is also the author of evolution. He is constantly displaying His profound life-creating power and we seem to overlook it. I just wish we could embrace Him and His power without worrying about trying to think that He couldn't pull off evolving life. Nothing is impossible with God!

Be blessed!

Answer 9

I agree with your argument. If you want a great, informative read, I would suggest "The Evolution Cruncher" by Vance Ferrell. It contains about 5,000 evidences against evolution that support a young Earth and intelligent design.

Answer 10

There is absolutely no difference between intelligent design and evolution they are both the same thing and only how we got here. What we should do is stop arguing about something that means nothing and start healing our world