Sand, for sure.
.
2007-03-08 09:15:18
·
answer #1
·
answered by tlbs101 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's quite dependent on the density (amount of tonnes per cubic metre) of the substance. Water has a density, at 21 degrees C, of 1 tonne per cubic metre...everything is related back to that fact.
Density is also realted to how many air spaces are between the particles of the substance - like if it's really dense there aren't many air pockets, therefore the water will have a hard time flowing, even through sand. If you were talking about iron particles in a loose agglomeration, then water would be able to flow through...
But if it was "in situ" (naturally occurring rather than just in a loose pile), then the particle sizes play a big role. They are, in order, sand; loam (mixture of sand, clay and topsoil); clay (the smallest particles of soil - less than 2 microns which is less than 2/1000ths of a millimetre) then iron.
If the iron is in situ - i.e magnetite ore - water would still be able to percolate through it - it would simply take a very long time. There's nothing really totally impermeable to H2O as it's normally a tiny molecule - smaller than just about anything else.
Hope this helps!
Love and Light,
Jarrah
2007-03-08 11:59:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by jarrah_fortytwo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
1. Sand.
2. Loam
3. Water will not flow through clay.
4 Water will not glow through Iron.
2007-03-08 09:24:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Water will flow through sand easialy
In order: Sand, Loam, Clay
Iron(NO WATER WILL FLOW THROUGH IRON)
2007-03-08 09:16:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by Kiran b 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
assuming that your iron is solid,water will flow most easily through sand.
you can try it for yourself.
God bless,
gabe
2007-03-08 12:07:32
·
answer #5
·
answered by gabegm1 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think loam. It's more permeable( and sorta' spongy.).
2007-03-08 09:13:12
·
answer #6
·
answered by comicfreak33 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
sand.
2007-03-08 09:40:50
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋