English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-08 08:58:30 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

11 answers

It takes faith and facts to believe in science.
A hypothesis' experiences only support or do not support, they do not prove. I am taking BIO and I don't know how many times I've heard the profess. say I don't know, or we're not sure exactly, but we think.... So yea.

2007-03-08 09:08:54 · answer #1 · answered by ♫O Praise Him♫ 5 · 0 0

Science observes God's creation. It is a blessing to be able to understand even a little bit of it.

Still, I put my faith in the Creator, not the creation. The laws of physics do not apply to God, whether He wishes to turn water into wine or stop the earth sun and moon for almost 24 hours. But even without such supernatural events, I still think His creation is a miracle...right down to the day-in day-out workings of the billions of atoms that make up my fingers as they type this answer.

2007-03-08 17:10:12 · answer #2 · answered by BowtiePasta 6 · 0 0

Yes - science takes faith to believe

2007-03-08 17:01:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Short answer yes. Long answer: faith is not really the right word to use to describe the commitment to relying on science and reason. Science is continually revised and, hopefully, improved in coherence.
One is committed to science more than having faith in it.

2007-03-08 17:06:24 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No. That's the thing about science. It doesn't demand faith, it asks for an open mind.

2007-03-08 17:07:02 · answer #5 · answered by Andrea 3 · 0 0

You can if you want, but it is much better to look at the facts and science and see why they are right; but if you don't have time then I guess faith will have to do. Watch out for pseudoscientific claptrap, though.

2007-03-08 17:07:19 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

of course but we need to consider all said "science" has some degree of inacuracy and when it comes to decifering the past we should be extreamly skeptic. considering it is impossible to have knowlage of unrecorded events. be sure your "facts" are baced on facts and not speculation.

2007-03-08 17:05:10 · answer #7 · answered by thespillgood 2 · 0 0

absolutely. and you do already...every day you have faith that your car will get you to work, that your computer will help you work. that if you should get hurt in some kind of accident, doctors can help you. did you question the biology lessons and multiplication tables? no...they are undisputible facts.

2007-03-08 17:03:18 · answer #8 · answered by elfkin, attention whore 4 · 0 1

Einstein said that science and religion should work together. He too believed in God. He said if we only support one side, it makes us incomplete.

2007-03-08 17:02:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

You don't have to have faith in facts, as they are proof. Faith is belief when there is no proof.

2007-03-08 17:02:07 · answer #10 · answered by photogrl262000 5 · 2 1

fedest.com, questions and answers