English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

just wondering as I have read some studies from the net that claim this maybe the case.

2007-03-08 06:56:52 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health Diseases & Conditions Cancer

9 answers

YES, It can be a part of the game, the following article will give you some clue:

Genetic Factors and Family History of Breast Cancer -- Some families appear to have a genetic tendency for breast cancer. Two variant genes have been found that appear to account for this: BRCA1 and BRCA2. The genes p53 and BARD1 also appear to be important. Researchers have identified some other defective genes that may cause breast cancer, including BRCA3 and Noey2 (which is a disease inherited only from the father's side of the family).

These facts suggest that breast cancer is caused by the growth of genetically damaged cells. Such genetic damage is known to gradually accumulate in the cells of the body over time. Women carrying mutated BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 genes have a "head start" in this process.

Hormonal influences are important because they encourage cell growth. High levels of hormones during a woman's reproductive years, especially when they are not interrupted by the hormonal changes of pregnancy, appear to increase the chances that genetically damaged cells will grow and cause cancer.
HENCE ONCE ANYONE IS PREGNANT IT DISTURBS THE ABOVE HORMONAL SYSTEM.

Hope answered your question.

2007-03-08 07:22:05 · answer #1 · answered by Dr.Qutub 7 · 0 2

Beware of who is promoting the research. If you look at the many websites arguing an abortion-breast cancer link, they are ALL by pro-life and/or conservative groups. NONE are by independent third parties.

While hormones production is interrupted in an abortion (and miscarriage), there is NO evidence, this leads to increased breast cancer. The research is NOT rock solid. It is mostly statistics where results have been BOTH ways (link and no link).

Disclaimer: I am anti-abortion and would outlaw it most cases if I had my way. However, I find dispicable the politicalization of science especially by the (religious) conservatives. Let the facts stand, explain the mechanism/rationale behind conclusions and, do not let preconceived notions (faith) guide your judgement.

2007-03-08 08:44:17 · answer #2 · answered by oncogenomics 4 · 2 0

If they are honest studies with genuine data, there is no reason to conclude there is ANY relationship between abortion and and breast cancer, any more than there is a relationship between eating potatoes and breast cancer!

2007-03-08 07:10:12 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Yes, although there has been a massive attempt by the abortion industry to cover it up. Over 37 studies have been conducted on the link between abortion and breast cancer. 28 of the studies clearly demonstrate that women who abort a baby are at a higher risk of breast cancer. One of these studies was led by Dr. Janet Daling, a researcher at the Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle and a "pro-choice" advocate. She said, "I have three sisters with breast cancer; I resent people messing with scientific data to futher their own agenda, be they pro-choice or pro-life. I would have loved to have found no association between breast cancer and abortion, but our research is rock solid, and our data is accurate. It's not a matter of believing, it's a matter of what is."

For more information, visit:
http://www.abortionbreastcancer.com/The_Link.htm
http://www.bcpinstitute.org/brochure.htm
http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=47655

For information on other aspects of abortion, visit http://Abort73.com

2007-03-08 09:10:15 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

I think breast cancer can be linked to many things, hormones therapy. I personally think there is a link to milk, look at all the girls sprouting early, all the stuff they give cows to produce.

2007-03-08 07:02:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No. I think cancers come from stressing the nearby or direct spot on the body or skin,and poor nutrition. Plus being inactive,eg.high percetage of fat to lean tissue.

2007-03-08 07:03:53 · answer #6 · answered by zaggittier 4 · 0 1

it is not neccessory. a number of othe factors also responcible
dr. chotiwala
www.chotiwalasayurveda.com

2007-03-08 07:03:05 · answer #7 · answered by dr.chotiwala 2 · 0 0

rubbish

2007-03-08 11:29:14 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

No, there is no relation.

2007-03-08 06:59:50 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers