English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

just wondering what the worlds opinion is on this subject. Thanks

2007-03-08 06:54:28 · 22 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Outdoor Recreation Fishing

22 answers

I go fishing every summer with my dad. I see no problem with it.
We obey the laws about which fish can be eat, what size, etc.

I think when people don't obey the rules than it's a problem.

2007-03-08 07:03:25 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Not sure if your question is aimed at profesional fishermen or recreational anglers but my thoughts are that generally (there are always exceptions) most anglers take care not to be cruel to the fish they catch as this is there sport and they want the fish stocks to remain so they can carry on enjoying there sport, in many ways they pay good money (Liciences, club membership etc) to ensure rivers are kept stocked ensuring fish species have a purpose and will always survive
The main cruelty in fishing comes from profesionals that drag massive nets thru the ocean catching everything in it's path and keeping only the targetted fish the rest of the catch (by catch) is returned to the ocean DEAD!! now thats cruel and should be stopped.
Paul

2007-03-09 20:22:16 · answer #2 · answered by paul R 3 · 0 0

People get caught up in fads and make assumptions with out having any knowledge or facts to back them up. PETA is a great example. They claim fishing is cruel and that fish feel pain and fear and on and on. They sponsor events in schools to discourage fishing, they want to stop you from enjoying yourself by making you feel guilty for something that is frankly, impossible.

Fish are pretty primitive in the animal world. They live entirely on instinct. A fishes brain is very small compared to yours, for example. It does not have the grey matter associated with reasoning. A fish can not feel emotions like "fear". They flee when a person, bird or bigger fish comes by, but they don't reason why, it's instinct.

The fish brain in lacking the higher reasoning structure of a mammal brain for example, also lacks pain centers. Fish physically can not feel pain. The reason a fish fights at the end of the line is the flight instinct kicks in and they want to get away. If a fish could reason and feel pain, you would not be able to catch the same fish over and over gain and any fisherman can attest.

So, bottom line, keep fishing, enjoy the outdoors, spend time with your family, it's all good.

2007-03-09 05:46:19 · answer #3 · answered by Sank63 3 · 0 0

50 plus years of enjoyment in catching many fish has convinced me that it isn't cruel at all. In fact, it is one of the all-time best bonding activities for families to do together.

Answering the question: is it cruel for the fish? - leaving out catching fish for eating and thinking only about fishing as a sport - I don't believe it is. Although we are taught that a fish doesn't feel a hook in its mouth, it is a fact that a small proportion of fish are injured or die as a result of being hooked internally rather than higher up in their mouth. When returned to the water, they make a quick and easy meal for predator fish, nature takes its course and another live fish that otherwise would have been eaten by the predator gets a reprieve. Is that cruel? Not for the one that gets the reprieve!

Today's laws in the UK have enlarged the size of keep-nets, improving the survival rate for fish caught and retained for later weighing of the whole catch, i.e. at the end of fishing matches. Catch and release and the use of barbless hooks for leisure fishing have further improved survival rates - meaning the fish grow larger, there are more of them and fishing has become even more fun!

2007-03-08 08:51:35 · answer #4 · answered by Golfaholic 2 · 1 0

No, it is not cruel to hook a fish. Every living thing needs to eat to survive. A carrot in which is planted and grown purely for food was fed with water and nutrients so that it would grow to be consumed. So because we don't keep carrots as pets, meaning they can't interact with us and aren't all cute and fuzzy, they are not to be considered a living thing at one time? My whole point is that no matter what we eat, it was a living thing at some point. So do I feel bad that I ate a carrot, because I had to hurt/kill it to consume it? Not at all, it's survival of the fittest. Sure, I could become an activist for carrots, telling the world about the cruelty that carrots endure. But we know how rediculous that would be. I agree that waste of food is what makes it cruel. Killing a carrot only to throw it away because it is spoiled is waste, just like any other food. So no I don't feel it's cruel at all. I just wish people were more conscious about the food that is wasted as not every nation is as plentiful as ours. Sorry for the sarcasm, but not sure how else to prove my point. Good Luck & God Bless!

2007-03-08 08:22:22 · answer #5 · answered by zero 3 · 0 0

No. it somewhat is unquestionably good simply by fact massive fish are breeding fish and that they do allot to help boast the inhabitants in a lake, ocean, river, etc. additionally, hook harm does not regularly do plenty harm( one guy certainly caught an identical fish 6 situations over the path of a million 3 hundred and sixty 5 days), and any hooks interior the mouth will devolve over some days. wish this helps!!

2016-10-17 21:32:32 · answer #6 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

No! Only the uneducated and ignorant of the populous think it's cruel. I really don't think fish feel PAIN the way we do.I've caught the same fish (Carp,Catfish etc..)hours and days after catching them with no ill effects on the fish. Also remember that the apostles were fishermen and our own Human existence is here because we were given the intelligence to harvest the bounty our Lord (supreme being if you will) gave us.

2007-03-08 08:26:29 · answer #7 · answered by redwingnut16 3 · 0 0

What a question to ask in a fishing community. Go hug that tree i cut down last week with the spotted owl sitting uptop its branches...and while yer at it quit eating the tuna. damn leberals need to be libberated of all thier freedoms. If you feel hunting and fishing is cruel, then so is eating beef, pork, and chicken. all of these animals have no hope for survivng since they day they are born. at least wild animals and fish have a chance to live.

And yes I love my steaks, mashed taters, and such. but i also love to hunt and fish. I feel my rights are being violated every day by the bleadinng heart libberals who just don't have a clue to how our echo system works.

2007-03-10 05:46:55 · answer #8 · answered by slim69782003 2 · 0 0

Fish's mouths don't have very many nerve endings in them making virtually impossible for them to feel the hook. I think fishing is great fun and a good way to catch a meal.

2007-03-08 07:11:08 · answer #9 · answered by Mandy W 3 · 1 0

No it's not cruel, it's nature. Look at what fish do to each other if you want to see what's cruel, but that's nature too. Life ain't a Dysney movie...

2007-03-10 12:05:08 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers