Twins! I have a very hard time carrying babies. So my next pregnancy will probably be my last. I want more than one more child so the only way to do that would be by having more than one baby at a time. Also, my girls are very close in age. They are a little less than a year apart (51 weeks). I would want my future children to have a bond like my girls do.
2007-03-08 03:24:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Singletons for sure. Twins would be quite a bit of work. One at a time for me.
My father and uncle were identical twins and to hear some of the stories my Grandma would tell about raising them would make anyone wish they had a set of twins, but I don't think I could handle it.
2007-03-08 11:24:26
·
answer #2
·
answered by bluegrass 5
·
2⤊
0⤋
Singletons since there is less chance of complications. Most people don't realize that multiples are high risk, even twins. I was a paranoid wreck my entire pregnancy with my twins. I never worried about a thing with my first two.
2007-03-08 16:29:08
·
answer #3
·
answered by totsandtwins04 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Singletons,well it's easier taking care of them .Twins will make you spent a lot in the first place and also they will not have enough of you because each one will want your attention.It is very hard to give all your attention to two at a the same time!For a single one,you will dedicate the your whole self to her.
2007-03-16 08:26:45
·
answer #4
·
answered by santana 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
i've always wanted a set of twins. but yet there are chances with alot more complications with twins. right now i'm pregnant with my second singleton but i still have a chance in the future because twins AND triplets run on the fathers side and twins run on my side of the family as well. my baby's father is a twin!!
2007-03-15 15:38:18
·
answer #5
·
answered by moore_256 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Twins! I have two kids who are 3 years apart and i wish that they were twins. Don't get me wrong I wouldn't trade them for the world, but I am an only child and I always dreamed of having someone special to grow up with. The good points of having twins is that they will be the same age and just about like to do the same stuff. See with my two their age difference makes were they totally don't like the same games, same activities or anything. They get along well, but hardly spend anytime together.
2007-03-16 09:03:39
·
answer #6
·
answered by mistywoods27 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Even though a single child would be easier I actually, I think i'd rather have twins. I hope one day to have a boy and a girl. It would be special to me to have both at the same time so they can have a twin bond. lol then i'd just get my tubes tied and call it quits.
btw-thanks for answering my two questions
2007-03-10 00:24:53
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
i thought i would want twins but after having my son, i am happy he is a singleton. twins run in my family so we could get them the next time around, of course i would be happy, i just think i would be really overwhelmed.
2007-03-08 11:26:40
·
answer #8
·
answered by funky1 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
If I were going to have a baby I'd prefer to have two singletons. That means two separate maternity leaves of a year each where I live. I'd LOVE to have two years off of work.
2007-03-08 15:42:09
·
answer #9
·
answered by LindaLou 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both; but twins first. It was a breeze when my daughter was born because I was used to doing everything double already! I have fraternal twins boys and a daughter that is 19 months younger than them...
2007-03-08 11:28:36
·
answer #10
·
answered by Twin+1 Mommy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋