2007-03-08 02:46:05 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Folks, let's learn to read. I never said I believed Bush attacked the US. He has been ACCUSED of attacking the US, ie planning 9/11.
Now that you've mentioned it, I have heard some bullsh!t that FDR was responsible for Pearl Harbor.
I do not consider the FBI assault on the Branch Davidians an attack of the US. Koresh led a cult that unlawfully imprisoned Americans, abused children, and stockpiled illegal weapons.
2007-03-09 18:34:23 · update #1
I would be surprised. Can't imagine anyone saying Roosevelt masterminded Pearl Harbor
Blind hatred is not patriotism
2007-03-08 02:49:44 · answer #1 · answered by John 5 · 9⤊ 0⤋
No, and as a liberal, I find these accusations to be not only ridiculous, but to the severe detriment of our nation.
As for Clinton "attacking the Branch Davidians," I think that user has to remember that David Koresh was holding children hostage and using them as sexual playthings, and that this "religious compound" was almost as well-armed as the U.S. armed forces. Something had to be done about it. The Branch Davidians do not represent America. Clinton did not "attack our country."
2007-03-08 10:57:23 · answer #2 · answered by Bush Invented the Google 6 · 3⤊ 2⤋
People did say that FDR let the pearl harbor attack happen. The movie ENIGMA is about how the code was broken and the truth about Pearl Harbor was known like a day before it happened. The mathematician went crazy I think because no one believed him and he couldn't stop it from happening. I don't know if they ever proved that FDR saw the document that was decoded before it happened but, many speculated.
2007-03-08 10:52:37 · answer #3 · answered by archangel72901 4 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Bush did not attack the US in the 9/11 sense. He let it happen but that's not how he attacked America. He has attacked our financial foundations by joining a neocon Congress in raising the national debt higher than any other. Never has it almost doubled under any president. He called our Constitution a "GD" piece of paper. That sounds like an attack on America to me. The Constitution IS America. So no, in a true military sense he has not attacked America, yet, but in other ways he has.
2007-03-08 10:57:35 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 4⤋
When Clinton attacked the Branch Davidians, he actually DID. Not like the crackpot moon-bats with their conspiracy theories about 9/11. The right to free speech is one thing, thank God I have to right to not listen to such drivel.
2007-03-08 10:54:55 · answer #5 · answered by lumpy r 3 · 3⤊ 3⤋
I didn't know that Bush had been accused of attacking the US?? I can see where he ever attacked the US, don't know of any President who did something like that.
PS - I like John's post that said that blind hatred is not patriotism. That is so true.
2007-03-08 10:53:48 · answer #6 · answered by Caleb's Mom 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Ronald Reagan and the first W
2007-03-08 13:30:22 · answer #7 · answered by DFatOne 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I'm sure there has been some - it's just now the mental hospitals are allowing their patients computer time - that’s why all the conspiracy theories have doubled. UN-PLUG THEM! Save electricity!
2007-03-08 10:56:21 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
Bush was accused of 'attacking the US'?
Oh, you mean those loony conspiricy wingnuts who claim he was 'involved' in 9-11...
I thought you were being serious for a minute.
Good one!
2007-03-08 10:50:31 · answer #9 · answered by Garrett S 3 · 8⤊ 3⤋
Kennedy, Clinton, Lincoln...
I don't understand how Bush attacked the US.
You believe that person who said airplanes did not actually strike the towers?
2007-03-08 10:50:46 · answer #10 · answered by Colonel 6 · 6⤊ 4⤋