English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It is possible have vestigial organ with creationist theory also:-
I want explain this with example, MS Word means Microsoft software & also notepad again Microsoft software
I make first document in MS word WITHOUT any formatting & second document in MS word with very good formatting.
I do this because I think MS Word is best option for me then notepad where much formatting is not allowed. Space in my hard disk is not problem for me
Now in first case if you say that there is much vestigial thing & this is only necessary in second case so first document has evolved from second document. This is not correct because I am creator. So vestigial organ do not necessarily confirm evolution with out creator (intelligent desigin) it only says what tools creator (tools may be improved with time) used while making species. This same principle is seen even in electronic gadgets of today.

2007-03-08 01:14:12 · 4 answers · asked by Dr Umesh Bilagi 2 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Probably this did not come to mind of Darwin as in those days in every day life as there were no common tools to do different jobs which are apparently disconnected. So he said unless creator had plan to mislead us there should not be any vestigial organ

My postulation is, when one makes different complicated structures, He or she will make some common tools, which are useful in making similar functions, in different structures; hence there is tendency for vestigenicity, by virtue of common tool being used.
So Vestigenicity does not preclude possibility of creator or intelligent design


I don not say that, there is no relationship between different species. I just say there is intelligent design which/who dictates natural selection & other mechanism of evolution. & vestigial organ as understood are not misleaders for creationist theory. Probably further vestigial organ can used find out what common tools intelligent designer is using for evolution so intelligent designer par

2007-03-08 01:16:35 · update #1

So creator is part of evolution

2007-03-08 02:03:17 · update #2

Now compares ion of software & evolution has created lot of misunderstanding’s want reply this to you all
When god is creator he dealt all species as his machines & as though we treated our machines. Now as there is vestigenosity in our machine by virtue of our technology, why don’t we accept the same vestigenosity by his technology.
I quoted above word document because I thought any body on internet will easily understand about word document I have mentioned about this short vestigenosity seen in our electronic gadgets
I meen look at one Chip which has been made do many functions… To do many function there has to be some amount of structural changes made in chip to do multiple functions .in such case, if in one machine only part of it useful than there is vestigenosity in that machine by that chip as only part of it is being used

2007-03-11 00:53:19 · update #3

4 answers

Basically what you said is that the creator spent massive amounts of attention to details like quantum physics, chemistry, astrophysics and normal physics (to name a few), but when he came to man and other life forms he slapped together a concept and left pieces of his tools. This doesn't make much sense.

2007-03-08 01:27:24 · answer #1 · answered by Pirate AM™ 7 · 1 0

You are talking on a material thing which will never happen. It will only happen on your mind alone, for you alone, maybe with your cohorts. But spiritual is different thing. You can not compare spiritual thing to material thing.

2007-03-08 09:26:25 · answer #2 · answered by Jesus M 7 · 0 0

What does WORD have anything to do with evolution?

OH, OK. I think you could have used a better example...

Anyway, I think God created us through Evolution, so it doesn't really bother me....

2007-03-08 09:20:18 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

What a waste of time, really.

2007-03-08 09:18:01 · answer #4 · answered by Wellhung Atheist 2 · 2 0

fedest.com, questions and answers