It is possible have vestigial organ with creationist theory also:-
I want explain this with example, MS Word means Microsoft software & also notepad again Microsoft software
I make first document in MS word WITHOUT any formatting & second document in MS word with very good formatting.
I do this because I think MS Word is best option for me then notepad where much formatting is not allowed. Space in my hard disk is not problem for me
Now in first case if you say that there is much vestigial thing & this is only necessary in second case so first document has evolved from second document. This is not correct because I am creator. So vestigial organ do not necessarily confirm evolution with out creator (intelligent desigin) it only says what tools creator (tools may be improved with time) used while making species. This same principle is seen even in electronic gadgets of today.
2007-03-08
01:13:33
·
10 answers
·
asked by
Dr Umesh Bilagi
2
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Now compares ion of software & evolution has created lot of misunderstanding’s want reply this to you all
When god is creator he dealt all species as his machines & as though we treated our machines. Now as there is vestigenosity in our machine by virtue of our technology, why don’t we accept the same vestigenosity by his technology.
I quoted above word document because I thought any body on internet will easily understand about word document I have mentioned about this short vestigenosity seen in our electronic gadgets
I meen look at one Chip which has been made do many functions… To do many function there has to be some amount of structural changes made in chip to do multiple functions .in such case, if in one machine only part of it useful than there is vestigenosity in that machine by that chip as only part of it is being used
2007-03-11
21:37:50 ·
update #1
I admire your knowledge on vestigial organ. But I have some doubts.
There was very big list of vestigial organs were there. Some of them have found have some function, but this dose not any prove that all classified vestigial organs have function
Now I also strongly believe in God as key person in evolution. Not just straight forward creation (sorry, I am hurting you)
Darwin allegation: - he says that vestigial organs can only accepted by creationist theory if God wanted mislead us.
I don’t accept this because. God has his own technology & economy, as we have ours & by our technology & economy we have produced so many machines. In view of God we are also machines for him. Now as in ours machines there are vestigial things, so same thing may accepted by Gods creation also
Now you have given explanation for some vestigial organs. I feel there is no explanation possible for small hind limb bones of Whales & moments of upper limb in humans while walking you can get many examples.
2007-03-11
22:00:29 ·
update #2
--First of all vestigial organs are a by-gone tale of the past:
*** Multiple Articles ***
*** g74 2/8 p. 16 Are Any Organs Really “Vestigial”? ***
FOR many years various organs of the human body were called “vestigial” by evolutionists, that is, the last vestiges of organs that supposedly once had a use, but were no longer needed because of the claimed advance up the evolutionary ladder. Of interest in this regard is the small gland that is shaped like a pinecone and hence called the “pineal” gland. Though it is located near the center of the brain, it is not part of the brain. “Until very recently” it was thought that “the pineal in man served no biologic purpose and was merely a vestige,” reported the journal Hospital Practice. Now the pineal has been shown “to possess a unique ability to produce melatonin.” This is a substance that affects the brain, the reproductive system, as well as the pituitary, adrenal and thyroid glands.
Scientists believe that in man the pineal gland “exerts a control over the body, specifically by regulating the body clock.” (Science Digest, September 1972) The pineal does this evidently by secreting various chemicals. Thus it is believed that the pineal gland may chemically supervise many of the involuntary activities of the human body, such as helping to make body temperatures increase during the daytime and decrease at night.
Another gland long thought to be useless is the thymus. In an article entitled “The ‘Useless’ Gland That Guards Our Health,” Reader’s Digest stated:
“For at least 2000 years, doctors have puzzled over the function of a pinkish-grey bit of tissue lying just below the neck and behind the breastbone—the thymus gland. . . . Modern physicians came to regard it, like the appendix, as a useless, vestigial organ which had lost its original purpose, if indeed it ever had one.
“In the last few years, however, the dogged detective work of a small band of Americans, Britons, Australians and Swedes have cracked the thymus enigma. These men have proved that, far from being useless, the thymus is really the master gland that regulates the intricate immunity system which protects us against infectious diseases. . . .
“But is the thymus the only organ regulating our immunity system? Recent experiments have led researchers to believe that the appendix, tonsils and adenoids [once these too were tagged as vestigial] may also figure in the antibody responses.”
---TO BE CONTINUED
2007-03-08 01:40:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by THA 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
There is really no such thing as vestigial organs. It is just a term applied to some body parts that scientist do not understand the purpose of. All doctors/scientist do not believe that some organs are vestigial.
Yes there parts of our bodies that can be removed without serious harm, but that does not mean they are useless.
2007-03-08 01:22:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by John S 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Evolution exists, but not like the want us to believe...
A man evolute to be taller, shorter, darker, thinner, but he's still a man... That's what i mean...
According to evolutionists, your wife between your arms was a cockroach one day, and she evolved to a pretty woman, a housefly Became a prime minister.. and my aunt was a grasshopper..
Evolutionists who think like that know about life as much as I know about Chinese Language.
2007-03-08 01:21:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by Lawrence of Arabia 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
What? You not making sense. At all. In any way shape or form. you cant compare editing on a computer program to evolutionist theory.
Who agrees with me that nonsensical arguments on the religious side are making us all look like ignorant retards?
2007-03-08 01:22:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
you really dont need all that to explain it - try this - are you less or more human with a vestigial organ - neither
at one point we needed it now we dont we changed but we are still human, microevolution happens and is not contrary to the Bible - macroevolution is and did not happen
2007-03-08 01:20:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by servant FM 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am sorry but you explained nothing in what you said.
Vetigel organs or call thus by doctors who do not know what they are used for. It does not say that they know everything!
2007-03-08 01:18:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Ignatious 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Huh?
2007-03-08 01:15:56
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
ok. Now how about the pineal gland? :)
2007-03-08 01:17:10
·
answer #8
·
answered by Trillian, Moon Daisy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
you must be a hit at parties.
2007-03-08 01:16:58
·
answer #9
·
answered by Zen禅Maiden :ジェダイ 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
you are way far from me
2007-03-08 01:19:00
·
answer #10
·
answered by kimht 6
·
0⤊
0⤋