that he is a God of grace, don't you?
2007-03-07 15:04:31 · 7 answers · asked by wisdom 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
He is indeed a gracious God.
But to speak against the Holy Spirit, is a line no one should cross.
2007-03-07 15:11:34 · answer #1 · answered by Bobby Jim 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It proves nothing. Too many possible other interpretations.
a. He doesn't exist.
b. He doesn't care.
c. He does strike people dead but has a busy schedule and cannot fit us all in as quickly as we deserve.
d. Nobody really speaks against him because nobody understands his true nature.
e. He considers it a greater punishment to allow us to go on living.
f. He doesn't have the power to kill.
g. He thinks we are a joke anyway and likes to laugh at us.
The list goes on and on. Maybe if he did strike at least somebody dead in public and loudly it would at least constitute objective proof of his existence. Proving existence by refraining from proving existence is not terribly helpful.
2007-03-07 23:23:55 · answer #2 · answered by John B 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
He has enough grace to give people a way to gain redemption, and time enough to have the chance, but his wrath cannot be put off forever and his judgment must come eventually.
2007-03-07 23:15:24 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Uh, no, why does he give us soooo much to speak against. It proves either that he doesn't exist or that he isn't as omnipotent as he would have us believe. Maybe free-will is our gift and his curse.
2007-03-07 23:12:20 · answer #4 · answered by Huggles-the-wise 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it just proves "he" really doesn't care so much for all these things that people apparently think are a huge deal to "him." Assuming he actually existed.
2007-03-07 23:14:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
that, and so much more. God is love
2007-03-07 23:07:18 · answer #6 · answered by aa.gabriel 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
or, it proves the more obvious conclusion that.....he simply isn't there.
2007-03-07 23:08:00 · answer #7 · answered by Samurai Jack 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋