Be careful what the evil one will whisper in your ear. Be careful what your eyes and ears take in.
God Bless
2007-03-07 10:57:27
·
answer #1
·
answered by Buff 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Do you have any idea ,how many Jesus Mary & Josephs there was after Jesus Christ rose from the dead. Every one that witness the events at the time approx 2000 yrs ago wanted to name their offspring these names!!!!!!However, the bones of Jesus will never be found.
He already ascended body & soul into heaven after his resurrection
Where is the exact location of the cave-tomb?
+ What exactly was found inside the ossuaries?
+ How can DNA testing confirm marital spouses?
+ How can we know the inscriptions are genuine and not forgeries?
+ Who found the tomb initially and how was it discovered?
+ Is there evidence of human presence in tomb between 30 ad & 1980?
2007-03-07 11:03:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Seriously, even if I weren't a Christian the whole "tomb" thing is plain bad science. If they claimed, say, Buddha, or Mohammed, or anyone historical was buried there based on this evidence I wouldn't believe it. Many of the opponents of the documentary are non-Christian scientists. The sad thing is supposedly rational people want to believe the find is genuine because it opposes Christian doctrine, except the media and broadcasters--they just want to make money.
* The tomb was uncovered in 1980. The original archeologists never suggested such a theory could be possible.
*The claim was first made by a BBC documentary group in the 1990s. It caused an outcry by the scientific community that caused the documentary to be shelved. The reason? Because the names Mary, Jesus, and Joseph were actually quite common in 1st century Judea and Galilee.
*The inscription claimed to be that of Mary Magdalene in fact reads "Mary known as Master" in Greek, not Mary Magdalene. To connect this name to her, they cite a single Harvard professor who refers to a noncanonical text called "The Acts of Phillip."
* The Acts of Phillip was written as a fiction, much like C.S. Lewis's Narnia. It was written in the late 4th to early 5th century. The oldest copy does not refer to the Mary character as Mary Magdalene of the Bible. The Harvard Professor referred to a 14th century version, which was rewritten to fill in missing portions. There is apparently an allusion in this later text to Mary Magdalene, although this reference is apparently not easily found in the story.
*An inscription scratched on in Aramaic says "Jesus, son of Joseph." These were very common names, as mentioned.
*Since the Gospels were written in Greek, we actually do not know how the Jesus, Joseph and Mary would have spelled their names in Semitic characters. As with Japanese, Semitic characters can be read in different ways. There are at least 13 different ways to spell "Mary." At least one scholar (Stephan Pfann, a jewish archeologist from Holy Land University) states that the name translated as "Jesus" is more likely "Hanun."
*One of the producers of the documentary was previously involved in the 'find' of a box inscribed "James, the brother of Jesus." This inscription was later tested and shown to be fake, added on later to an ancient artifact.
BTW, the whole theory of Jesus being with Mary Magdalene originated with a book called "Holy Blood, Holy Grail, which was written a few decades back.
2007-03-07 11:04:37
·
answer #3
·
answered by praisedivinemercy 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
The so-called findings of a fiction writer are more reliable than a book that has maintained its place and accuracy for about 2000 years? Those claims are easily disputed, for those willing to listen. Jesus rose from the dead and left no remains behind.
2007-03-07 10:58:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by Bob T 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
There was no conclusive evidence that this was the tomb of Jesus Christ. Why Cameron produced this project is beyond me; what a fool. Nothing can be proven.
2007-03-07 10:59:47
·
answer #5
·
answered by DeeDee L 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
There is no way to prove beyond a doubt that it is in fact Jesus. Mary, Joseph, and Jesus were popular names in that time. There is no DNA evidence to compare the findings to. There is one more question I will ask why does a poor carpenter have a family tomb in Jerusalem? For me it doesn't add up.
2007-03-07 10:57:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by Mouse 2
·
1⤊
1⤋
the element the church homes concern even greater advantageous than human beings probably looking out Jesus replaced into not resurrected, replaced into married or had a toddler replaced into that the documentary could very properly bring about human beings questioning. yet in line with human beings's solutions right here, i in my opinion do not think of they have plenty to stress approximately.
2016-10-17 12:39:00
·
answer #7
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no way someone could have found Jesus' remains because if you didn't know, He rose from the dead. His body is no where on Earth..it's in Heaven, with His spirit.
2007-03-07 10:58:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by em<3 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
ah, no... even the archeologists who found the bones almost 30 years ago agreed they were not the bones of Jesus Christ.... someone just wanted to make $$$ on the story and fools out of people who would believe it
2007-03-07 10:54:38
·
answer #9
·
answered by livinintheword † 6
·
4⤊
0⤋
Jesus is standing at the right hand of the Father.
Get me Gods DNA, then we will talk.<><
2007-03-07 10:56:52
·
answer #10
·
answered by funnana 6
·
3⤊
0⤋
I dont have.... to My Bible tells me exactly where Jesus is. After His supernatural (resurrection) no DNA was left behind......I wouldnt doubt that The Lord is looking over the balcony of the third heaven and laughing at this.................<>< <><
2007-03-07 10:58:38
·
answer #11
·
answered by skittles 2
·
3⤊
0⤋