English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The articles of the truce would be:
No faith may be recogonized as the only true faith in any nation
No one may make laws pertaining to their faith
No one may make laws pertaining to a lack of faith
No one may be socially judged by faith or lack of faith
No one may dictate their faith or lack of faith unless asked
No relationship, contract, or human right may be dictated by faith or lack of faith under any law
No religious words or texts may be displayed on public property or mentioned on public property for the use of making a declartion of fact, truth, defense, or faith
Likewise no lack of faith can be done for the same goal.
All laws, government bodies, and aspects of soceity shall be dictated with reason, intelligence, and common sense.No faith shall be placed on or against this and nor shall anyone be deined their beliefs
Faith shall be a private matter of consent and not a public matter of coercion as such with no faith

Would you sign this truce with these articles?

2007-03-07 08:28:48 · 11 answers · asked by Demopublican 6 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

For some, the war continues.Keep in mind that those who wouldn't sign this truce are usually the ones claiming to be victims to those mean Atheists who make fun of thier beliefs.Well, here is your chance to end those mean jokes at your expense.All you have to do is keep your beliefs to yourself and the Atheists would also have to keep their views to themselves.You could end the fighting right now.Any takers?

2007-03-07 08:36:19 · update #1

11 answers

Absolutely. Faith is a personal choice. A world where you're free to practice without fear of persecution sounds darned delightfull


http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20070307063317AAafqTA&r=w

2007-03-07 08:33:26 · answer #1 · answered by Goddess Nikki 4 · 1 0

Not if the articles of the truce are made by a man and not agreed upon by all or a majority and not if ANY group was going to be placed in a secondary role to another. 3B

2007-03-07 08:35:16 · answer #2 · answered by Beach Babe 2 · 0 0

NO...what a ridiculous set of laws serving only those with no faith. No religeous freedom is the antithesis of what America is all about. That is why I love being an American. I can express my faith if I want to in almost any forum.

2007-03-07 08:33:17 · answer #3 · answered by sheepinarowboat 4 · 1 0

No, I would not accept such a truce, because it would be a compromise of the Truth, and there can only be One Truth. Anything that contradicts Truth is, by definition, False. Therefore, the first article of your truce would be a lie.

2007-03-07 08:41:18 · answer #4 · answered by FUNdie 7 · 0 1

First of all I didn't realize I was at war. What you are saying is to take away freedom of religion. People of faith need to speak out against injustice. Basically you want an atheistic society to rule, what makes your way right?

2007-03-07 08:33:44 · answer #5 · answered by angel 7 · 0 0

Can we also sign a truce that replaces the word faith with science?

2007-03-07 08:39:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Sounds like Turkish law.

2007-03-07 08:32:41 · answer #7 · answered by mamasquirrel 5 · 1 0

No I am compelled by GOD, the Bible and The Holy Spirit to preach the Gospel of belief whom is Jesus Christ.

2007-03-07 08:32:25 · answer #8 · answered by Tribble Macher 6 · 1 2

Yes, and the world would be better for it.

2007-03-07 08:32:45 · answer #9 · answered by ? 2 · 2 1

Not a chance.

2007-03-07 08:31:29 · answer #10 · answered by Fish <>< 7 · 1 1

fedest.com, questions and answers