i stand on my 2 feet
2007-03-07 06:19:20
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Nothing like a biased question.
I stand on science, see the tangible evidence, and see God. Those parts of God that science is unable to show, I take on faith.
I stand on science, see the tangible evidence, and discredit much that non-theists state is proven.
2007-03-07 14:25:59
·
answer #2
·
answered by awayforabit 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
God is the cause of all causes, science come from God, and the brain of the scientist come from the big brain of God also, if they want to miss use their brains for deny the existence of God, that is another thing.
I want to stand in a solidg ground, i want something substantial not ephemeral.
There is God, or the Almighty One, from whom everything emanates, by whom everything is maintained and in whom everything is merged to rest. Material science has tried to find the ultimate source of creation very insufficiently, but it is a fact that there is one ultimate source of everything that be. This ultimate source is explained rationally and authoritatively in the beautiful Bhägavatam, or Srimad-Bhägavatam.
2007-03-07 15:02:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Personally, I believe God created science. I'm a strong Roman Catholic, but in the larger picture, a Christian. The Church teaches, and so did his apostles, that God created everything. I'm puzzled why people argue the point of science and religion. God created the world, he created grass, he created sky, he created animals, and he created us. People have this image in there head that he zapped them down from Heaven. We don't know how everything got here, only that it was Gods plan. God didn't zap computers or TVs down from heaven, intellegent people who came from God created them. I believe in science and God, I don't believe they contridict. I don't see how people think things could have developed without God, there wouldn't have even been a black hole if it weren't for him.
2007-03-07 14:23:15
·
answer #4
·
answered by emcjensen 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I do believe in God. I am not against science, however. I view science as to our discovery on how God made the universe.
2007-03-07 14:23:54
·
answer #5
·
answered by Mark M 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am empty of inherent existence, so therefore I'm whatever labels people seek to attach to me, and of the ones I use to describe myself is Buddhist and atheist. Why? Because I question the answers a lot, studied religions in as fine detail as I humanly could, from every angle I possibly could, to include the history of religions and so on... between all of that and regular studies in behavioral science, medicine, and the usual sciences.... it got me to where and who I am now.
_()_
2007-03-07 14:21:11
·
answer #6
·
answered by vinslave 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I believe God regardless of what science says.
2007-03-07 14:20:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Jeancommunicates 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I believe in God. Science and my God have no conflicts. Evolution is real and undeniable. God may well be the catalyst however.
2007-03-07 14:26:56
·
answer #8
·
answered by Sun: supporting gay rights 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
science and the bible go hand in hand...so I would have to say I believe the Bible and God with all My being, and the science God created I also believe in..
2007-03-07 14:19:46
·
answer #9
·
answered by Pastor Biker 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Science can't deny that God exist, its like saying "I believe in Evolucionism, but not in Creacionism"...its dumb!, because none of the two can be scientificly proved, its all about faith and decisions.
My decision is to believe in God, I think I've seen enough proves in my life, His help has helped me go trough a lot of stuffs, and even though I'm open to listen to new theories I belive in HIM completly! :)
"God its like love...you can't see it, but you can feel it"
2007-03-07 14:23:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by dg153l 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
I am a firm believer in God.
2007-03-07 14:24:22
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋