If it was mandatory to have one would you take one and have it implanted on your hand or forhead?
If they tell you that its for national security reason.
2007-03-07 05:39:37 · 27 answers · asked by chillyphilly 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
No way
2007-03-07 05:42:23 · answer #1 · answered by Jmac 2 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I would accept them for parolees and violent released criminals and most definetly convicted sexual predators.
I would also accept a national ID, although given we are all given a social security card and most people have drivers license it seems a bit redundant.
I could care less if the gvt randomnly listens to my phone calls if they are just looking for key phrases or words to find terrorists. I have nothing to hide.
I would not, however, be ok with regular law abiding citizens being implanted. It is just too much power in the hands of the gvt. That is where I think I would draw the line.
2007-03-07 05:47:24 · answer #2 · answered by cadisneygirl 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, I've never had my ears pierced and I certainly wouldn't let anyone plant something inside my skin. No implant will protect this country. What a dumb idea. If this happens it will only be to control the people and not for national security. Ten thousand people can come across the border before they are even caught to question. We have illegals throughout America because no one bothers to follow up on their whereabouts while they are in our country. Foreign Exchange Students don't even report to their college. Straighten up the current system.
2007-03-07 05:51:13 · answer #3 · answered by Jeancommunicates 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No, I would never accept that and here is the reason.
Revelation 13:16
16 He also forced everyone, small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on his right hand or on his forehead,
Reminds me of the mark of the beast.
2007-03-07 05:52:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
I would fight so very hard to make sure that this did not happen. I would refuse to accept an implant, and I don't think I would be alone.
2007-03-07 05:43:09 · answer #5 · answered by MishMash [I am not one of your fans] 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I would absolutely refuse to take one on any grounds possible in a court of law. Barring that, I know exactly where I would be disappearing into the wilderness.
2007-03-07 05:44:35 · answer #6 · answered by Crusader1189 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I would not be too happy. But not because I think it has anything to do with the coming of Anti-Chris, or whatever other crazy idea you might have.
2007-03-07 05:43:09 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I'm not keen on the idea, and I'd fight it, but not because of some silly superstition about the Mark of the Beast. I'd only be concerned about the personal liberty and health aspects.
2007-03-07 05:46:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Hell no. I would not take anything to be implanted in me to be used later for the AntiChrist.
2007-03-07 05:45:58 · answer #9 · answered by greeneyes25162 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nah, it would just chafe my skin.
They also want to build a wall around the US for Security reasons.
It also keeps in what they are trying to keep out.
2007-03-07 05:42:56 · answer #10 · answered by Get A Grip 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Why would I want that. It's just silly. I like my driver's license. It works just fine.
And the mark of the beast thing is something some lunatic in a cave made up.
2007-03-07 05:45:05 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋