2007-03-07 04:53:21 · 20 answers · asked by WWTSD? 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
They can split the atom, but they can't find evidence for a world-wide flood. Simply amazing!
2007-03-07 04:56:35 · update #1
Yeah. Silly scientists. They thought Troy was a myth...until they found the ruins! Scientists still want to see the top of Mt. Sinai, but darn those Syrians won't let anyone in. Apparently, the entire top of the mountain is black obsidian....from what sort of force, it is unknown....
As far as I'm concerned, the more we know, the more amazed I am by the intricacies of God's creation! I find it very exciting. Even the use of gravity as a means of propulsion through space may one day be feasible. We just have to find that knowledge and nurture it. God let us have all kinds of knowledge. He just with held the immortality.
2007-03-07 04:59:41 · answer #1 · answered by Shinigami 7 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Scientists are reluctant, not unable, to find any evidence that promotes fanatical beliefs, because religion has been used as a dangerous political tool, when politics and religion should be separate. Why do religious people want to stop scientific advances? God can stop it if he wants to. By the way, not even the Bible is accurate about what's inside the Bible. It was written by so many people, the contradictions are nearly impossible to count. Science is not against you. If there is a god, it seeks to find him out. If there is not, what are you worried about?
2007-03-07 13:20:47 · answer #2 · answered by Tink 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
What makes you think they haven't? It's one thing to have the evidence. It's another thing for the science community to allow for it to become public. Have you ever heard of "Earths in Upheaval" by Immanuel Velokovsky? A man who did not believe the Bible, nor the flood account of Genesis, was finding proof of a worldwide flood all over the world, as well as evidence that animals were fleeing in fear from rising water levels. He did not know how to explain it, so he rather just laid out the evidence as he found it and left the reader to decide.
2007-03-07 12:58:14 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
It can be baffling how they can have the truth written out in front of them for centuries before they see it, yes! But I've noticed, as I'm a scientist myself, that the more people look for the truth with an open mind the quicker and easier they will find it. 'Seek and you will find, knock and the door will be opened to you'. How true!
2007-03-07 12:58:03 · answer #4 · answered by Saved777 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
You can't blame scientists for not being right about the bibles contents. Rarely do you find a scientist who will even try. Consider this.......the bible was not written by scientists so maybe it is unfair to expect intellect to prevail over religeous belief (?)
2007-03-07 13:00:11 · answer #5 · answered by we_are_legion99 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Yeah, it's strange how they can find evidence for things that happened, but can't seem to find evidence for things that didn't actually happen.
You're right, it must be because scientists are stupid. It can't possibly be because something in the Bible didn't happen exactly the way it says.
2007-03-07 13:00:17 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
They have done just fine.
It is you that needs to do a little more studying.
There is plenty of scientific proof out there to support biblical events. Check out the living waters website.
2007-03-07 13:02:50 · answer #7 · answered by Buff 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
It is incredible. Most Christians don't have a problem with taking antibiotics even though the non-science world used to laugh at the idea that there were little invisible "bacteria" making people sick.
2007-03-07 13:00:34 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
they say that eggs are good for you... then.. oh, eggs are bad for you.. then, yah, they are good for you
then the ozone layer is disappearing or has a huge hole... then wow, the ozone layer hole is closing... oh, now it is opening somewhere else... maybe it has done this forever before they even 'knew' it existed?
just cuz they have not found something does not mean it isnt there.. nor does it mean it hasnt happened.
2007-03-07 13:02:47 · answer #9 · answered by livinintheword † 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
and...they cant even understand what holds a single cell together. impressive. By the way...scientist also once thought the universe revovled around the Earth, and that the world was flat.
2007-03-07 12:58:54 · answer #10 · answered by Underdog 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋