We have caveman bones & the bones of our evolutionary ancestors but no Adam?
Perhaps they could show us that Adams body had a high concentration of silicon in his bones to prove that he was made from dirt.
2007-03-07 03:19:48 · 11 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
One would think that the original man and women would be fairly easy to find, or at least something that would indicate that they existed.
If they had existed, we would find no traces of any human before, say, 10,000 years ago. We'd find a gradual build up of human evidence in the initial settlements as humans poliferated and then the population would bascally disappear due to the flood. the same process would restart near Ararat...
Too bad that this is not the case, as we have evidence of modern man streching back to 300,000 to 700,000 years ago.
2007-03-07 03:32:08 · answer #1 · answered by Pirate AM™ 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Still not quite there. If you had inquired about the bones of Moses that would have really showed me something. I think you KNOW that finding Adam's bones is impossible. Are you playing devils advocate or are just that avidly against God ?
2007-03-07 05:07:47 · answer #2 · answered by swindled 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Adam's bones would be pretty well impossible to distinguish from any others. We may have already found them.
Meanwhile, evolutionary theory has used mRNA to figure out who Eve was.
2007-03-07 03:24:13 · answer #3 · answered by awayforabit 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's not very nice. They wouldn't know what to do with them if they found them, they still think there is a "missing" link. One of them even claimed that scientists used mRNA to prove Eve. They were trying to trace the mitochondrial DNA, not the mRNA. Alas, they couldn't. All of us have different mitochondrial DNA tracing our maternal roots, but the fact that it is different means that there has been massive mutation (which would then have to be accepted as proof of evolution) or that we are not all descended from one woman.
2007-03-07 03:32:18 · answer #4 · answered by Huggles-the-wise 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Can you find and identify the bones of a specific caveman?
And let's not forget that we cannot even find the missing link.
2007-03-07 03:24:39 · answer #5 · answered by Draco Paladin 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have to wonder if any of these answerers really understand what they mean by "missing link" or if they're just spouting what they think is a convenient catchphrase counterattack. Well, couldn't be the former, or they wouldn't be doing it in the first place.
2007-03-07 03:26:53 · answer #6 · answered by gomez_leovinus 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lol
How about we get a container of dirt and say hey this is Adam's bones?
2007-03-07 03:27:15 · answer #7 · answered by Jan P 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
First you find some of the billions of missing links we should be tripping over.
BTW the pig tooth from Paraguay and ape skulls don't count.
2007-03-07 03:23:20 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not to mention that he was 90 feet tall!
(yes that's written in both the Koran and the Apocrypha...)
2007-03-07 03:23:29 · answer #9 · answered by Yoda Green 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
lol
Adam was from another planet.
God says so.
In ALL of the scriptures.
Heaven? its just figurative speech.
2007-03-07 03:23:04 · answer #10 · answered by Antares 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋